To give you a temporary break from essays that require open-ended analysis, I have created two slightly more targeted essay prompts that are disguised as multiple-choice questions. It is very important that you explain your answer fully, but also that you keep it short: No longer than a single page for
each essay prompt, with single-spacing and a font no smaller than 10 points. You are free to reference cases and materials that we have read, but you are not required to do so. In preparing your analysis, there are no
restrictions on what information you can review. But all of the work that you submit must be entirely your own, and you may not receive assistance from any other humans, including other humans enrolled in this class. To
assure that your analysis is complete, it might be wise to refresh your memory of the example that was provided in connection with Essay 1. You can find that example here.
Essay 2
Lucy Verity and Adie (her younger sister) spend most of their waking hours in a virtual world known as AvaTerra, where anyone is able to create a permanent online avatar that can do, in the virtual world, just about
anything that humans can do in the real world.
Over the course of several years–in constant collaboration with one another–Lucy and Adie have built a virtual
store in Ava-Terra that has become extremely popular: Thousands of avatars purchase digital goods and
equipment that can be used and enjoyed in the virtual world. For each sale, Lucy and Adie receive payment in
Terra-Libras, the virtual world’s currency, which they have always converted to U.S. dollars and stockpiled in a
joint bank account that they think of as their store’s rainy day fund. Neither of them have ever made a
withdrawal from the fund.
Lucy and Adie have never formally talked about how long they will keep running the store, or placed any labels
on exactly what their venture is. But Adie was shocked, at the end of last summer, when she returned from a
two-week “unplugged” summer camp, to learn that Lucy had entered into a contract to sell the store to another
avatar in exchange for digital currency that is equivalent to about $1.5 million real-world dollars.
Which of the following statements are true about the relationship between Lucy and Adie, and which are false?
Fully explain your reasoning, being sure to include a summary of the applicable law.
(A) Lucy and Adie cannot possibly have a partnership based on the facts described.
(B) If a partnership exists, and Adie objects to the sale, the contract will definitely not be binding on the partnership.
(C) If a partnership exists, and the sale occurs, Adie has a right to be paid a fair value for the countless hours that she spent building the business.
(D) If a partnership exists, then Adie was not required, in previous years, to include any portion of the rainy-day fund on her individual tax return, because the partnership never distributed any of the money to Adie but
instead retained all of it for use with the store.
(E) If a partnership exists, and the sale occurs over Adie’s objection, Lucy may be liable to Adie for breaching the partnership agreement (or for breach of fiduciary duty) by selling the store without consulting Adie.
Essay 3
Alex, Bailey, Cora, Duke, and Ernest were the original partners in Lexington Building Supply (LBS). Ernest
notified the others in November 2017 that he was withdrawing from the partnership. Duke (who had recently been expressing serious concerns about a drop in the quality of building materials that LBS was receiving from its vendors) was hospitalized briefly the same month and decided to take a brief hiatus from work. He had no communication whatsoever with the other partners between that point and when he died while attempting to scale Mt. Everest in June 2018.
Last month, Ernest was summoned to a partner’s meeting, where he learned that LBS had recently been sued
by a builder whose mostly finished construction project suffered a spectacular collapse because of defective
materials that the builder had purchased from LBS in January 2018. The lawsuit ended last month, when the
court awarded damages against LBS in the amount of $3 million dollars. 
At the meeting, Ernest was introduced to Fran, who (he was told) became a partner in LBS in March 2018 at
the invitation of Alex, Bailey, and Cora, largely because Fran (who is flush with cash) was willing to make an
immediate capital contribution of $1.5 million dollars.
At the conclusion of the meeting, Ernest (and the executor of Duke’s estate, who was also in attendance) were
given buyout checks for their share of the partnership interest, based on the current value of the partnership.
The remaining partners were sincerely apologetic that the partnership’s value had declined so much as a result
of the lawsuit.
If the partnership has no written partnership agreement, and if the applicable state law follows the majority
rules, determine which of the following statements are true and which are false. Fully explain your reasoning,
being sure to include a summary of the applicable law
(A) It is unlikely, based on the facts described, that Fran became a partner in March 2018. It is still possible,
though, that Fran’s contractual agreement (entered into the same month) committing LBS to purchase several
commercial delivery trucks from a local dealership, will be binding on LBS.
(B) Assuming that Ernest’s decision to leave the partnership was not wrongful in some way, the buyout check
offered to Ernest clearly has not been calculated correctly and is probably less than he deserves.
(C) It is improper for LBS to reduce Duke’s interest in the partnership with any losses associated with the
lawsuit, because he was not actively involved in the management at the time, and he had previously been
warning about the quality of LBS’s materials.
(D) If Fran did become a partner in LBS either in March 2018 or sometime thereafter, she has no liability for the collapse of the structure, because it occurred before she entered the partnership. For this reason, the $1.5 million capital contribution is beyond the reach of the builder.

Sample Solution

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer