Complete this after you’ve watched the debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham. Based on what you saw in the debate, evaluate a minimum of 3 pieces of biological and archaeological evidence used by Bill Nye to support the theory of evolution. Compare this to 3 pieces of evidence that Ken Ham used to support creationism. Based on the evidence, whose argument was more convincing? In your opinion, who won the debate, or at least made the most compelling argument(s)?
Initial post
Write 1 paragraph for each side of the argument, and 1 paragraph about who won the debate (minimum 3 paragraphs)
Sample Solution
