As an educational psychologist, you know that self-regulation and motivation play a role in learning for both young students and adults. As part of your job, you may be asked to consult on promoting more positive learner directed behaviors. Choose one of the consultation scenarios below that fits your interests.
Scenario One: Pat Evans teaches seventh grade language arts. Pat has taught for 3 years. Observations indicate that Pat uses a variety of media in the classroom, clearly posts and enforces classroom expectations, and is a content area expert. Pat is concerned about a group of boys and girls in the second period class. This class has 23 students. There are three students of concern; one is a girl and the others are boys. None of the students are below grade level, English is their first language, and they do not have IEPs or 504 plans. The behaviors of concern include coming late to class most days and failing to complete homework assignments. Pat has tried cooperative groups, but it has not had a positive impact on any of the three students.
Other assumptions: The school has good resources. The class has a set of mobile devices (such as iPads). There is wireless internet. The parents will not be involved in whatever program you design. The program must take place within the school day.
Scenario Two: In the rural town where you live, you have been asked to consult with Jordan Smith, the owner of the Widgets Manufacturing Company. Mr. Smith knows you are an educational psychologist not an industrial psychologist; he feels you are the company’s only hope. Mr. Smith is concerned because production is down, the workers seem apathetic and Mr. Smith does not know what to do to increase production. If production does not increase within the next 6 months, Mr. Smith may close the family business. Mr. Smith has developed a new system for manufacturing widgets, which will double to triple the widget production. The more widgets — the more sales. Yet, the workers ignore the routines and stick to the ones they know. Some of the workers have been making widgets for over 30 years.
Assumptions about the workers: Language is not an issue; the new system will double or triple output. The system is logical and safe; the workers have the intellectual capacity to master the new system. Over half of the workforce is 40 years of age or older. Training was adequate for workers to implement the new system.
In each of the scenarios listed, self-regulation and motivation will likely impact the learners’ ability to complete the learning tasks. Consider a developmentally appropriate approach for consultation in this situation. You will prepare a consultation proposal to address one of the scenarios. In your proposal for consultation, consider the following:
An initial statement of the problem.
The persons you would involve in the meeting.
Possible expected outcomes.
In your proposal, be sure to explicitly define the theories of learning that you plan to use, rationale, and why you believe your approach will work.
Describe possible technology applications that may be helpful in accomplishing the expected outcomes. You should discuss the features and characteristics of the technologies and explicitly address why the explored technologies were or were not chosen.
In addition to the text, be sure to include at least one outside research study or best practice article to support your approach.
The paper should be 2–3 pages (excluding title page and references). Format your paper, including citations and references, according to APA style (6th ed.).
Apply constructivist models in an instructional setting to improve learner performance.
Discuss the uses of technology to support constructivist learning activities.
It also addresses the course outcomes:
ED555-2: Evaluate selected instructional models based on context and learner differences.
ED555-3: Prioritize variables within learning contexts that promote learning effectiveness.
ED555-4: Determine the most appropriate application of emergent technology within contemporary learning contexts.
The standard reiteration of Marxist evaluates of liberal private enterprise depend on a typical topic which surmises that free enterprise is on a very basic level imperfect and malevolence since it depends on a structure of abuse, i.e., the bourgeoisie, the individuals who possess the methods for creation, savagely misuse the low class, the people who offer their work and don't claim the methods for generation. Marx accepted, basically, that entrepreneur domains are based on the backs of the low class, who receive insufficient benefits for their work. He theorized that the fundamental distinction between the different financial types of society, between, for example, a general public in view of slave-work, and one situated in wage-work, lies just in the mode in which this surplus work is for each situation separated from the genuine maker, the worker. (Marx, 1859, p. 209) While well meaning and substantial in some ways, Marxists investigates for the most part flop on scholarly, down to earth, and exact levels. The primary scholarly disappointment is show in Marx's own statement, above, which presumes that wage-work is adequately an indistinguishable methods for abuse from slave work. This is just valid if the low class filling in as the work have no methods or any expectation of accomplishing proprietorship stake in the work that they do or the associations for whom they take the necessary steps. In spite of the fact that it might have been valid in 1859 when he composed it, liberal private enterprise has advanced, especially in the United States, to the condition of an individual-possession society, where openings flourish for people to expect a stake in the work that they do, not only gather a paycheck for their labor.In Marx's brain, the main route for specialists to free themselves from this subjection was to by and large claim the methods for generation. The adequacy of this scholarly model has up to this point been a contemptible disappointment as far as the outcomes when it has been endeavored. On an experimental level, the basic truth is that by far most of governments that have been framed utilizing Marxist or Communist hypothesis have themselves had a tendency to be exploitative fiascos in contrast with the entrepreneur social orders over which they were planned to show moral and monetary predominance. The Soviet Union, which propelled its Marxist upset in 1917 under Vladimir Lenin, turned into an incredible financial and military power, yet amusingly did as such just by abusing its low class under the degenerate, oligarchic manage of totalitarian and on account of Stalin, destructive — despots who ruled with a blend of an iron clench hand and a huge, solidified organization. The Soviet Union fallen under its own weight, a total ideological disappointment, and its part states swung to industrialist economies and fair types of government. (To be reasonable, a few Soviets, at the season of Lenin's domination, trusted it was too early to execute Marxist rationalities, since Marx's own particular prerequisite had not been met — that the nation's entrepreneur economy had achieved its developmental endpoint.) China, however still a suitable country state which employs extensive monetary power, has figured out how to maintain a strategic distance from the Soviet Union's destiny by presenting a significant number of free-advertise components into its state-controlled economy. Sadly, China shares the previous Soviet Union's inclination for merciless concealment of individual rights. The main other as of now remaining true blue Marxist/Communist state is North Korea, whose frightful monetary conditions, devoted culture of love for its despots, and absence of respect for singular rights, represent themselves. That in 2005 Marxism would have been so missing from the worldwide political guide would have been a tragic hit to Marx, as would the way that the main endeavors at executing his methods of insight in their most perfect structures have prompted fierce, totalitarian administrations which have ostensibly disregarded the low class as intensely as any unregulated industrialist economy. On a political level, Marx may have additionally thought little of the intensity of the marriage of majority rule types of government to liberal entrepreneur frameworks. In principle, in any event, delegate majority rules systems are innately organized to engage the working class by giving them participatory voice in the basic leadership that goes into overseeing the financial frameworks of their country. Vote based system, as we probably am aware it today and as the pre-prominent type of government on the planet, was apparently still a generally youthful worldview as Marx was building up his speculations. The supremacy of the ideas of the value and decision of the individual rights, singular flexibilities is a characteristically fair thought which both negates the uninvolved community recommended by Marxism and furthermore gives an inherent protect against industrialist abundances when they start to support theocracies over individual rights. Majority rules system is interesting in its capacity to diminish enhance the harsher impacts of unregulated market private enterprise. At the point when focused markets are permitted to prosper unchecked, surely awesome riches is made, yet Marx's scrutinizes of misuse wind up legitimate as restraining infrastructures and governments jump up to interfere with rivalry and make a domain in which the low class neglect to profit by the work they have put in for the benefit of, for instance, partnerships. Be that as it may, agent popular government has endured the abhorrences of untempered market cycles and responded as needs be. A standout amongst other cases is the American Great Depression, in which a sharp securities exchange crash in October 1929 set off a financial chain response that left a huge number of Americans jobless and in starvation. The aggregate fuss and cries of the working class provoked the chose government to take genuine restorative measures throughout the following couple of decades to accommodate intends to temper the inalienable blast and bust cycles of free market private enterprise, and to make a social security net for poor people and the elderly (e.g. Government disability, ensuring retirement salary to senior residents). Likewise, in Europe, nations where the scourges of free market industrialism once attacked the farmland, for example, England, law based frameworks of government have step by step slid their economies into communist half breeds, showcase economies with impressive components of state control and welfare frameworks to guarantee the low class are all around watched over. Lamentably, Marx either was not able see the potential estimation of these future cross breed frameworks, for example, showcase communism, with their capacity to make up for disparities, or basically declined to have faith in their suitability since they neglected to coordinate his strident interest for hopeful immaculateness inside human interrelations: Even if such unjustifiable imbalances were disposed of, Marx would at present protest the nature of market social relations since they would keep on being predicated on a sort of greedy pride in opposition to the necessity of a genuine network. (Warren, 1998) On a mental level, Marxist investigates of liberal free enterprise additionally come up short since they need viable knowledge into how the human mind works and rather depend too intensely on idealistic goals of people working hopefully on an aggregate level. Marx’s hypothesis of human instinct is an organic dream, and we have the cadavers to demonstrate it. Which may drive us to ponder: if socialism is fatal on the grounds that it is in opposition to human instinct, does that infer that private enterprise, which is in opposition to socialism, is unmistakably perfect with human instinct? (Wilkinson, 2005) The reality of the situation is that individuals are a progressively slanted animal groups that flourish with power and rivalry. Left unchecked, these driving forces can bring about horrendous, fratricidal conduct, however when bridled and appropriately diverted, these motivations shape the core of the free market economy, which blossoms with singular activity, sound rivalry, and the mission for self-change and initiative. The mental spine of Marxist scrutinize is the presumption of an interminable condition of victimhood with respect to the mistreated, which neglects to consider the natural human inclination to oppose persecution and change existing frameworks into more libertarian structures. At the end of the day, Marxist-style insurgencies may well be pointless, as the working class appears to every now and again discover routes inside entrepreneur frameworks to attest their rights. Individuals will dependably have their seeker gatherer driving forces, yet this does not mean they are fated to be pernicious: There is no real way to stop strength looking for conduct. We may trust just to channel it to non-destructive employments. A free society in this manner requires that places of predominance and status be broadly accessible in a huge number of gainful chains of importance, and that open doors for more prominent status and strength through predation are restricted by the steady cautiousness of “the people”the extreme turn around strength order. A thriving common society allows nearly everybody to be the pioneer of something, regardless of whether the neighborhood Star Trek fan club or the city chamber, along these lines to some degree fulfilling the human taste for various leveled status, however to no one’s genuine disadvantage. (Wilkinson, 2005) At last, Marxism is a generally critical and punctilious theory, just like its scrutinizes of liberal free enterprise, which is an in a general sense hopeful and individualistic rationality which supplies every individual with both the obligation and the ability to expect control of his or her own fate and individual satisfaction. As humanist Ellen Huang notes, under the focal point of basic Marxist hypotheses, disparity decides every human connection, and accordingly overemphasizes the persecuted idea of the colonized. Facilitate reflections of the dynamic of free enterprise may disregard genuine types of obstruction, leaving idealistic dreams as the main choice for the abused. (Huang, 2003) Humanity is dependably in desperate need of handy alternatives established in dreams, not only the fantasies themselves, regardless of how all around proposed they might be.>GET ANSWER