Taxi Driver (SCORSESE, 1976, 114-mins.)
Pay special attention to how the relationship between shots works to communicate narrative and thematic
meaning. To that end, be sure to do a shot breakdown of at least part of a given scene so you can describe
how specific shots are set-up and composed to communicate such meaning in the scene through the interior
lives of the characters — this will include the relationship of the characters to each other, through their
arrangement together and with their environment, as well as in relationship to the camera and the perspective
of the viewer.
(Note: You don’t need to answer all of the following suggested questions, but here are some specific ideas to
consider…)
How do the compositional choices by the director delineate relationships between characters and their states
of mind within a scene? Think back to the large desk separating the two characters in the scene from Little
Caesar, or the way that young Charlie is framed in the window in the center of the image while playing in the
snow outside during the scene from Citizen Kane. What do the arrangement and position of characters and
objects in the frame communicate about their importance to one another and to us as the audience? Are
characters balanced in the frame or are they shown unequally, and what does this indicate about power in the
scene? And what of the lighting contrast and color palate? How do those elements work to convey thematic
meaning?
Pay particular attention to the camera choices the director makes — the angle of shots and the distance of
characters and objects from the camera, including whether characters are framed alone or together and their
arrangement in the frame, whether viewed from above or below or straight on, captured in a distant long shot
or close-up, a canted frame, with soft or sharp focus, diffuse light or hard shadows. Is there a constancy to how
characters are portrayed in the frame, such as from a particular angle or with particular lighting, or does this
depend on the relationship between the characters from scene to scene? Why might the director make a
particular choice in the framing of a character, or develop any variations for a given character?
Are there any POVs in the scene that convey the subjective view of a character? How does such a choice
create an emotional connection to the character or specific insight into the character’s state of mind to aid your
narrative experience of the film,? In what other ways does the director convey this kind of individual
subjectivity? Consider the use of light and color in this way.
Finally, what about camera movement? This can be key to the creation of meaning and the emotional and
thematic energy of a film. Is the camera typically static, or does it move with any characters within the scene?
Does the camera ever move on its own, guiding us through the world of the film? What do you think motivates
the movement of the camera at such times and how might such independent movement suggest the presence
of an omniscient cinematic narrator? Does the camera move for all characters, or just for some? And does it
move in the same way for each character, or in particular ways for specific characters? What do these camera
movements communicate about the relationship between the characters in a given scene, and do any camera
movements ever convey dramatic or thematic meaning to effect the way we experience the film?

Sample Solution

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer