• Creation of MCQs, explanations and commenting for assessment purposes is
performed online in PeerWise during weeks 6-9 of the course inclusive. Students are
expected to contribute online at regular intervals throughout this period with the
expectation being at least twice per week.
• In addition, a selection of MCQs and comments (as outlined below) is required to be
submitted online via ‘Assignments’ in Canvas on, or before, the due date. An
accompanying cover sheet must be downloaded and copied on to the front of your
assignment before submitting. Hard-copy submission is not required.
• Plagiarism checking will be performed on all submitted assignments by Course
Coordinators using ‘Turnitin’.
• You must read the following documents prior to preparing and submitting your
assignment:
o Medical Imaging Assessment Requirements and Presentation Criteria
o Referencing of Images in Medical Imaging Assignments
o Student Academic Conduct Statute
o The Use of Third Party Assistance in Undergraduate and Postgraduate
Coursework: Guidelines for Students
All of the above documents are available in ‘Assignments’ on Canvas. Assignments that
are submitted that do not comply with the instructions and information in these
documents may either incur penalty or not be accepted for marking.
Assessment Outline:
In Module Two of the course, each student is required to contribute to creating a bank of
multi-choice questions (MCQs) that aims to test the learning goals of this module using
the online tool PeerWise.
During weeks 6-9 inclusive of this course you are required to:
• Create a minimum of four clinical scenarios that reflect a theme from the
module topics (at least one per weekly topic) being the MRI clinical
environment, MR bio-effects, MR safety, and gadolinium-based contrast agents.
For each scenario, provide a minimum of one MCQ and post these on
PeerWise. The MCQs should aim to test your fellow students’ knowledge, ability
to apply this knowledge to clinical practice and their critical thinking/decisionmaking abilities. For each MCQ, you need to include a full explanation of the
correct answer and justification for each of your chosen distractors. You are
encouraged to include MRI images, photos and/or diagrams, videos, links to
journal articles and other supporting resources as appropriate.
• You are also expected to participate in commenting on your peers MCQs (via the
‘Comments’ feature on PeerWise). This feedback may clarify any confusion or
misconceptions, propose alternative distractors (including explanations) or
higher level questions, or provide additional relevant information and/or
supporting sources to extend the discussion further.
• The course lecturers will provide feedback via a Canvas online ‘Conference’ at
5pm Wednesday 8th May on MCQs posted by 10am the previous day.You can
use this feedback to improve your questions prior to final submission. After that
date, the lecturers will not be involved in this assessment. Rather, as a class, you
will continue to provide feedback on PeerWise to each other’s MCQs.
• Once posted, you are not allowed to edit or delete your question as this also
resets any responses and comments. You may however choose to use the
‘Improve explanation’ feature if you would like to expand on, modify, or clarify
any information. If you would like a question deleted, you must contact the
Course Coordinator to ask permission.
• You can create, comment on and answer as many MCQs as you like BUT the
MCQs you create and the feedback you give should demonstrate your
engagement with the concepts presented in the course and how they may be
applied in clinical practice.
• MCQ references should be included at the end of the explanation. It is expected
that a minimum of 3 references are included for each MCQ and that a range of
sources are used across the submitted MCQs. Similarly, all comments should
include supporting resources that are fully referenced.
What to hand in for this assessment: By the final due date you are required to copy
and paste the following contributions (including a link to each contribution on PeerWise)
into a Word document and submit online to Canvas for plagiarism checking:
• 4 scenarios (including a minimum of 1 MCQ and full explanations for each)
that you have created (at least one from each Module Two weekly topic) that best
demonstrate your ability to engage with the learning goals of this course. Include
all of the following:
o the full question (including images if used)
o all alternative answers
o full explanation (including any ‘improved explanations’)
o reference list
o topic tag
o any comments from other students
o link to the question
• 2 comments that provide constructive feedback that you have posted on your
peers’ MCQs that best demonstrate your ability to critically question and/or expand
on other students’ contributions. Include all of the following:
o the original question
o all alternative answers
o full explanation (including any ‘improved explanations’)
o reference list
o topic tag
o your comment (including any replies to your comment)
o your reference list
o link to the question
Each of your scenarios is of equal value and contributes 15% to the assessment mark (60%
in total). Each piece of feedback contributes a further 20% to the assessment mark (40% in
total). If any of the above contributions are not submitted, a corresponding proportional
penalty deduction for each missing weekly scenario or piece of feedback will be applied.
You will only be marked on ‘Knowledge’ and ‘Criticality’ (see associated marking
criteria form) for the questions and comments that you hand in – you can contribute
as much as you like to PeerWise. It is expected that you submit your best 4 scenarios
and 2 comments that demonstrate exemplary understanding of the themes and ideas
outlined in Module Two, and fulfil the requirements set out on the marking criteria form for
this assessment.
The ‘Participation’ mark will be assigned to your online activity across Module Two.
Please Note: You will get out of this assignment, what you put in. While it is not required,
we recommend you attempt to participate more than the minimum requirements above.
The more MCQs you create, the better you will get at constructing them. You will also have
more to choose from when you need to hand in this assessment. More importantly, the
more you write, comment, and answer the better your knowledge of course content and
ability to apply these concepts to your own clinical practice!
More detailed information and supporting resources are available in ‘PeerWise
Tips’ on Canvas and you should ensure that you read all of this prior to
commencing this assessment.

Sample Solution

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer