Write an introduction (400-500 words) to introduce the topic (related to ‘globalization’) of your final paper. It should include the following elements: 1) a description of what the central issue is – i.e. what is the main problem or question that you are dealing with; 2) a preliminary argument – i.e. your answer to the problem/question; 3) some background information and context must be provided in order to make the focus of the paper clear.
Using the topic introduced above, create a bibliography that contains at least ten scholarly sources (you are expected to primarily cite scholarly books and journals; if you do not know what a scholarly source is, please go here: https://www.library.illinois.edu/ugl/howdoi/scholarly/). You are expected to use the Chicago style. Make sure that you are using citation guide (a manual can be found here: https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html) and not an online citation machine when compiling the bibliography. You can cite no more than two chapters from The Blackwell Companion to Globalization textbook.
From the ten scholarly sources used above, four should come in the form of a bibliographical annotation. Each annotation should be one paragraph (250-300 words) and should include the following elements: 1) a complete bibliographical citation; 2) qualifications of the author/s – i.e. is the author an expert on this topic?( If they are not experts, then your source is not good) 3) a summary of the argument and/or findings; 4) how this work supports your own research (your topic, your central issue, and your argument)
totle's remarks on majority rules system should be comprehended against the previous foundation and furthermore to be considered with regards to his general portrayal of "right" and "distorted" constitutions. A constitution (politeia), to him is a method for sorting out the workplaces of the city-state and characterizing the administering body. The contrast between right types of governments and debased ones is that in the previous, the end (telos) of government is to administer for the benefit of all of the residents, though in a distorted type of government, the telos is to empower the governors to profit by the administration. He records three "right" constitutions: sovereignty, gentry and commonwealth, which include the standard of the one, a couple and numerous to benefit general society. Then again, there are three "debased" constitutions which go astray from these: oppression emerges when the ruler rules for his very own advantage; theocracy results from privileged when the men of means rule for their own favorable position; and popular government emerges from nation when the poor standard to their greatest advantage. Out of these distorted types of government, oppression is the most exceedingly awful, at that point theocracy pursued by vote based system, which is the least terrible on the grounds that it is the most moderate. Aristotle considered vote based system to be meaning the standard of the demos or average citizens to their greatest advantage. Another point on which Aristotle sensibly demands is that the genuine qualification, found actually, among government and majority rules system isn't that between rule of the couple of and rule of the numerous yet between sway of the rich and power of the poor . With equivalent authenticity, he certainly dismisses Plato's realization of a perfect majority rules system or some other type of government and contends that there are a few sorts of vote based system and theocracy to be found practically speaking. The main type of majority rules system depends on the standard of balance, where the rich and poor have similar focal points. The subsequent structure stipulates an unassuming property-capability for the holding of office. In the third and fourth structures, which are portrayed rather ambiguously, the entirety of the residents rule gave they pass investigation, yet they all maintain the higher standard of law. In the last and most outrageous type of majority rule government, it isn't the law which is sovereign yet the huge number of individuals: through the impact of revolutionaries who curry their support against the nobles and rule prevalent attitude, the individuals itself become>GET ANSWER