Propose a high-level quality improvement initiative for a selected departmental strategic priority, and choose an effective method of presenting your proposal to executive leaders and other stakeholders in the organization and community.
Explain the rationale for establishing a strategic priority.
Describe the overarching aim and focus of your proposed quality improvement initiative.
Use the evidence-based literature to provide broad rationale for establishing this priority.
Present the key points from a SWOT analysis of a chosen strategic priority.
Consider the organization’s political landscape and strategic priorities.
Identify key performance indicators for measuring the success of a quality improvement initiative.
For example: infection rates, customer satisfaction, financial performance indicators, productivity, nurse satisfaction, or other internal metric.
These indicators could align with those identified on the departmental balanced scorecard.
Explain the value of stakeholder feedback and the process for collaborating with stakeholders on the proposed quality improvement initiative.
Identify key stakeholders and explain why their support for this initiative is crucial to its success.
Explain how you will leverage stakeholder feedback.
Explain how one contemporary change theory could be used to facilitate changes inherent in implementing a quality improvement initiative.
Make policy recommendations to support the proposed quality improvement initiative.
Your recommendations could entail developing a new policy, revising a current policy, or retiring a current policy.
Describe the policy implications of this initiative and their impact on the organization.
Justify your recommendations.
he theory of Marxism, and more specifically the effectiveness of Marxist literary criticism, can be easily diminished when not supported with credible sources and research. Throughout the review of Marxism and Literary Criticism, R. Berg-Pan discusses how the author Terry Eagleton provides his readers with reliable information and a simplified introduction to the Marxist theory. Unlike other Marxist literary criticism authors, Eagleton is able to give a deep insight into the theory itself in a short eighty-eight-page novel, due to his commitment to his beliefs. Since Eagleton studied the theory of Marxism beginning in the 1970s, ran a seminar on Marxist literary theory in the 1980s, and published several books on the traditions of Marxism, he serves as an extremely dependable source. Voltaire’s novel Candide, the main character Candide serves as an ideal exemplification of Karl Marx’s theory of Marxism. This review of Eagleton’s novel has provided me a vast amount of convenient information on the theory of Marxism and the benefits of Marxist literary criticism. Colodny, Robert G. “The Problem of the Ruling Class in Marxist Theory: A Comment.” Science & Society, vol. 51, no. 1, 1987, pp. 93–96. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40402764 The Marxist theory, also known as Marxist philosophy is commonly defined as literary works in philosophy that are actively guided the theory of Marxism created by Karl Marx. The essential features of Marxism in philosophy are not only viewing material possessions as more important than spiritual values, as well as being committed to setting administrative political duties as the overall desired result of everything. The comment article, written by Robert G. Colodny, discusses the complications that can be caused in the upper class when considering Karl Marx’s theory. Colodny analyzes John Hoffman’s essay on The Problem of the Ruling Class in Marxist Theory: Some Conceptual Preliminaries, and states how Hoffman’s work serves as an extremely valuable source for historians studying Marxism due to its comprehensibility and credibility. John Hoffman is a Professor of Political Theory at the University of Leicester and has written a>GET ANSWER