Post a brief description of general healthcare technology trends, particularly related to data/information you have observed in use in your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Describe any potential challenges or risks that may be inherent in the technologies associated with these trends you described. Then, describe at least one potential benefit and one potential risk associated with data safety, legislation, and patient care for the technologies you described. Next, explain which healthcare technology trends you believe are most promising for impacting healthcare technology in nursing practice and explain why. Describe whether this promise will contribute to improvements in patient care outcomes, efficiencies, or data management. Be specific and provide examples.
Majumdar and Nagarajan (1994)33 found that dimensions of institutional speculation are emphatically identified with the present execution dimensions of firms. In any case, a less-more grounded, however positive, impact is built up between changes in execution levels and changes in institutional possession. The outcomes depend on an examination exploring U.S. institutional speculators' venture system. Bethel et al. (1998)34 predictable with the view that showcase for fractional corporate control recognizes and corrects issues of poor corporate execution, found that extremist financial specialists commonly target ineffectively performing and enhanced firms for square offer buys, and accordingly declare disciplinary impact on focus on organizations' arrangements in mergers and acquisitions. Douma, Rejie and Kabir (2006)35 explored the effect of outside institutional venture on the execution of developing business sector firms and found that there is constructive outcome of remote possession on firm execution. They likewise discovered effect of remote speculation on the business gather connection of firms. Speculator assurance is poor if there should be an occurrence of firms with controlling investors who have capacity to dispossess resources. The square investors influence the estimation of the firm and impact the private advantages they get from the firm. Organizations with such investors think that its costly to raise outer assets. Bhattacharya and Graham (2007)36 examined the connection between various classes of institutional financial specialists (weight touchy and weight safe) and firm execution in Finland. It recorded proof that these institutional proprietors possess stakes in various firms crosswise over businesses, prompting a conceivable two-way causality or endogenous issue between firm execution and proprietorship structure. It was likewise prove that institutional speculators with likely venture and business ties with firms have negative impact on firm execution and the effect is extremely huge in contrast with the negative impact of firm execution on institutional possession. Wiwattanakantang (2001)37 explored the impacts of controlling investors on corporate execution and found that nearness of controlling investors is related with higher execution, when estimated by bookkeeping estimates, for example, return on resources and the business resource proportion. In any case, the controlling investors' inclusion in the board negatively affects the execution and it is increasingly articulated when the controlling investor and administrator's proprietorship is at the 25-50 percent. The proof additionally uncovered that family controlled firms show essentially higher execution. Remote controlled firms just as firms with more than one controlling investor additionally have higher profit for resources, in respect to firms with no controlling investor. Abdul Wahab et al. (2007)38 analyzed the connection between corporate administration structures, institutional proprietorship and firm execution for 440 Bursa Malaysia recorded firms from 1999 to 2002 and found that institutional speculators positively affect company's corporate administration rehearses. Qiet et al. (2000)39 found that firm execution is emphatically identified with the extent of offers possessed by the state. Also, they discovered little proof in help of a positive connection between's corporate execution and the extent of tradable offers possessed by either residential or outside financial specialists. Wahal (1996)40 saw that albeit institutional financial specialists, especially, lobbyist establishments, have been effective in their endeavors to influence the administration of focused firms, these equivalent firms have not shown execution upgrades. Studies looking at the connection between institutional property and firm execution in various nations (fundamentally OECD nations) have delivered blended outcomes. Chaganti and Damanpour (1991)41 and Lowenstein (1991)42, for example, discover little proof that institutional possession is associated with firm execution. Seifert, Gonenc and Wright (2005)43 investigation does not locate a steady relationship crosswise over nations. They presume that their conflicting outcomes may mirror the>GET ANSWER