Will review one of the juvenile mass school shooter cases listed below. A couple of them also killed one, or both, parents, in addition to students at school. Each of these juvenile mass school shooters was “bound over” to adult court, tried, and sentenced as adults.
Charles Andrew Williams
Thomas “T.J.” Lane
apply your own state and case law, identify forensic risk assessment factors, and evaluate your own biases pertaining to the case you chose.
Write a 10-page (not including references, title page, or abstract) APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:
• Review/research current state laws pertaining to juveniles “bound over” to adult court. Provide an analysis of your state laws regarding juveniles sentenced as adults. If you are an international student, you may use your local or regional laws.
• Evaluate risk factors that may have contributed to the shooter’s actions. Be sure to include developmental risk factors.
• Recommend forensic risk assessment instruments that would be appropriate to be used in evaluating risk specific to this case.
• Evaluate your own personal biases, which may lead to weaknesses regarding how you effectively communicate the results of the forensic assessment where the defendant is a juvenile given a life sentence.
• Explain ethical concerns that may impact your work on this case.
three. in terms of innovations every few years we read of latest products that come out available on the market, and every now and then we study of the defects and recalls. those are few of the examples that indicates that guy is fallible and hence everything that is finished with the arms and brains could have errors and defects. should it's that a single screw was lacking from that lawnmower why it was recalled? what about that vehicle dealer that instructed us we had a four 12 months warranty on the automobile, then after a 12 months we get a be aware that there's a remember?, those are all due to the errors of man and the screw ups of guy to try this which they have been skilled for and gifted to do, in the ideal way. inside the case of the bible, the identical rule applies for that reason main to the truth that it is fallible and now not infallible. the books of the bible outlines a courting between god and guy, there we examine that god famous himself and made certain assertion to guy. these declarations known as “revelations” arise several instances in several scriptures, however without proof we'd be ignorant and gullible to simply accept and trust these scenarios. we have to agree that there are instances when we misspeak and at different instances we are misinterpreted or misunderstood. should that have took place here? what if these revelations are false? what if, simply what if? allow’s not follow the time period revelations to those fraudulent statements except we have evidence of same occurrences. thomas payne mentioned the following “within the former part of “the age of cause “i have spoken of the three frauds, thriller, miracles and prophesy. the energy of the almighty cannot be verified as to whether he advised man on this stuff has absolutely everyone long past to test for mistakes which can had been written therein, or oops the writers are all useless. who were the enhancing employees or turned into it even edited? according to williams edelen, (2002) in an article on the secular net, “every person who attempts to tell you that the bible is without mistakes or contradiction is a biblical and historic illiterate”. “it's miles lack of knowledge at the most pathetic factor”. having an open mind does not hurt; we should prepare ourselves for the “iffies” of existence. tremendously, many will have an open mind approximately matters that blessings them directly: take into account that first date that didn’t cross well? but we went on date #2, three, four, and sometimes 5 earlier than we reduce that crazy free. now not ever date will turn out that manner, however we would be extra careful subsequent time, wouldn’t we? it’s on that premise that we must have an open mind approximately the infallibility of the person written bible as a book riddled with thought frightening and eye rolling errors does happen. the songs of solomon are amorous and silly, but has been known as “divine anointed or clever”., they may be placed after the e-book of ecclesiastes and claim to had been written in b.c 1014. it has been recorded and demonstrated that solomon was 19 years antique at this time and had his palace packed with concubines and wives. solomon become therefore taking part in honeymoon on a each day basis and so caught up in his feelings that he had no time to think consciously earlier than writing. sam harris requested a very direct for your face query when he asked “who positioned the good inside the appropriate book? that is a severe query that requires lot of research and explaination.because even if a perception in god and the bible has a reliable positive effect upon human behavior; this is not a purpose to trust that it's far infallible. a perception within the infallibility of the bible is a perception in god and hence the countless nature of god. but there may be nonetheless no evidence that the memories in the bible are authentic and thus the doctrine of “christianity” stays a mystery. the bible outlines that the israelites had been gods chosen people. in the event that they have been, why couldn’t he correct them, why have been they so unruly? those those who he selected select and branded as his “selected human beings “were extremely corrupted and did not anything but laugh at god. as thomas paine puts it, “jews had invented to cover the baseness in their very own characters, and which christian monks on occasion as corrupt, and regularly as merciless, have professed to believe” . whoever wrote this stuff has left a bitter taste within the mouths of christians, if he was all perfect, why didn’t his selected humans obey him?” end: clarity is essential for maximum folks to accept new statistics; we do hope that we were clear. expertise is continually important to counter incorrect info being filtered from the opposite facet towards us, we do hope our understanding changed into enough to keep off their assaults. pastors, philosophers, instructors and circle of relatives members might also have taught us otherwise, but while the evidence is so clear, we have no different desire but to just accept the inevitable. the bible isn't infallible. an infallible bible needs to have infallible authors and infallible readers. where are they? if one has no problem with any of the testimonies within the bible then h>GET ANSWER