Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case

 Identify all the all key facts provided in the case study.
 Propose additional assumed facts that could theoretically affect the legal analysis or defense.
 Explain all of the key legal elements of the claims or defenses and suggest alternate legal theories that could be used as a proper legal basis for
additional claims or defenses.
 Articulate with precision the manner in which the identified facts support or defeat the stated legal claims or defenses.

Sample Solution