Hurricane Katrina still ranks among the most expensive disasters in U.S. history. A large portion of that figure is due to infrastructure damaged in the storm and the costs associated with rebuilding it. Understanding the complexities of modern critical infrastructure and key resources is essential in disaster recovery planning.
This week you will write an essay based on a case study of Hurricane Katrina in order to apply lessons learned and avoid the pitfalls encountered on the Gulf Coast while continuing to study the recovery along the East Coast.
Write a 1,400 word analysis comparing the short-term and long-term recovery efforts of Hurricane Katrina.
Identify at least two critical components related to Hurricane Katrina’s short-term recovery operation (for example: roads, public transit, bridges, levees and dams, ports and airports, communications, water and sewer, or electricity and gas).
Identify at least two critical components related to Hurricane Katrina’s long-term recovery operation (for example: roads, public transit, bridges, levees and dams, ports and airports, communications, water and sewer, or electricity and gas).
Consider how the following factors were affected as a result of all four components you identified: -Disaster resilience -Economic vitality -Quality of life -The potential for positive change between human systems and the environment
Consider the following in your analysis: 1. What specific challenges were encountered during the damage assessment and debris removal in both the short-term and long-term disaster recovery operation?
Consider the following in your analysis: 1. What specific challenges were encountered during the damage assessment and debris removal in both the short-term and long-term disaster recovery operation? 2. What structural and nonstructural mitigation efforts were utilized, if any? 3. What structural and nonstructural mitigation efforts should be incorporated into future recovery efforts?
In the event that markets can give ladies' garments up to a size 24 for what reason can't extravagance style brands do likewise? The markets charge a similar cost for a piece of clothing in a size 10 as they do in a size 24. I accept this is because of the way that they can stand the misfortunes they may bring about for any additional expense of creation as they are a general store and they can receive the rewards of drawing in more customers who will undoubtedly burn through cash in different pieces of the store. The equivalent can't be said for high road design retail outlets or without a doubt the extravagance end of the style showcase. It appears they can deliver a 'petite range' yet not a 'hefty size range'. On the off chance that they produced 'hefty size' attire this would bring about additional expenses for, right now, obscure rewards in deals/benefit. Not at all like Forever 21 they would prefer appear to not to take the risk of attempting this. Is the purpose behind this the expense of creating the garments and promoting and showcasing them or is it since they feel that somehow or another this may stop their present clients from shopping in their stores. This could be the reason some high road style stores just sell bigger sizes through their on line sites. This isn't useful to the larger sizes who might want a similar administration that is accommodated ladies shopping coming up, by observing, contacting and attempting on garments. With respect to the extravagance end of the market, they don't give this administration, it's an instance of 'what you see is the thing that you get' they once in a while offer any bigger sizes on the web and in the event that they do they are not offered over all lines and are typically an exceptionally constrained scope of things. Utilizing the reason of costing and it not being prudent to deliver bigger sizes would not appear to wash as shops, for example, Evans, Simply Be and Yours figure out how to do this. With respect to the extravagance end of style, I basically can't imagine them changing sooner rather than later. Notwithstanding every one of the remarks and statements above it shows up they are as yet reluctant to try and attempt to extend their range to cook for anybody for the most part over a size 12. In numerous different businesses this would be viewed as segregation. It would just take one acclaimed fashioner to have the prescience and certainty to create a scope of garments explicitly in bigger sizes to break this 'lockdown' that exists in the creator world. This garments go does not need to be equivalent to that made for littler sizes>GET ANSWER