What does Palmer think about the claim that there are no universally held moral values?
Even if all cultures differed in their values why is it an invalid step to conclude from that, that there are no objectively best values that should be adopted by all cultures?
Explain at least two arguments against cultural relativism.
Based on the reading, make an argument that some cultures have better moral values than others and are are morally justified in making moral judgments about cultural practices of other societies and in some cases even forcing them to abide by better moral principles.
How does the allegedly typical “female” style of moral thinking differ from utilitarianism or Kantianism?
Sample Solution
