Paper details In the Chomsky-Foucault debate on human nature, who do you think makes the more compelling argument and why?
Do you find yourself agreeing with Chomsky, or do Foucault’s suspicions resonate with you? In other words, who won the debate?
Paper details In the Chomsky-Foucault debate on human nature, who do you think makes the more compelling argument and why?
Do you find yourself agreeing with Chomsky, or do Foucault’s suspicions resonate with you? In other words, who won the debate?