Unit VIII PowerPoint Presentation
Review the processes of invention and innovation.
Select a new product that you have been introduced to in the past 12 months. You are encouraged to research this new product using outside sources. You can use the same company you have been researching, or pick a new one.
You are to create a PowerPoint presentation about future inventions this new product could help to inspire and what innovations could be developed to enhance and impr
Consider yourself a management consultant. You have been commissioned by a domestic Saudi company to elaborate a report on the conditions necessary to successfully enter a ‘new’ market in foreign country.
The senior management responsible asks you to assess the current strategy of the company, to produce realistic strategy and develop a plan for entering the new market (you have to select a particular foreign market on where your company will operate)
To accomplish your tasks you have to:
- Identify the pros and cons of the actual strategy of this company (choose a Saudi company from the real market).
- Present the key challenges you are likely to face when internationalizing the business?
- Describe the optimum and realistic strategy to a successful entry in the new market. Justify your choice of this strategy.
Note: the chosen strategy should be supported by your findings from research of relevant theories and models.
- Develop the steps for entering this new market
- Present recommendations to the senior management team to gain market share and improve the competitive advantage on the new market.
ove this product.
Analyze how these two areas could impact the company.
Your PowerPoint presentation should include the following elements:
Slide 1: Title page
Slide 2: Description of the new product
Slide 3: Description of the importance of R&D to include lead users and market research
Slide 4: Discussion of appropriate structure and culture within the company necessary to support innovative ideas and products
Slide 5: Exploration of future inventions inspired by the product or analysis of future innovations of this product (Was this a successful invention leading to innovation?)
Slide 6: Prediction of product demand in five years
Slide 7: List of sources using APA guidelines
people are subjective because regardless of seeking to forestall affecting international that they're a part of, they are changing it. This courting, which reasons a change inside the international through motion, adjustments any goal view into a subjective one because they're influencing what a pure observer can't. by way of trying to absolutely stop ‘doing’ and simply have a look at, humans attempt to reach a country of pure objectivity. This, but, will become an not possible task as soon as one considers that their mere life is an ‘act’ in and of itself. which means that the handiest manner to grow to be really goal is to quickly forestall current, look at basically in that non-existent country, and then resume present in the world as a man or women. which will even recall acting those impossible obligations is comparable to being God. In overall, it's miles impossible for a person to achieve a country of non life clearly due to the fact the mere act of residing causes one to come to be subjective due to the truth they've a power on the world around them. even as they are younger, humans eventually reach a point when they grow to be conscious that their existences are enveloped in exclusivity. They see that their lives are filled with selections, forks in the street which make it apparent that each time one chooses some thing, some thing else have to be excluded. those alternatives can carry the ache of having to weigh among the alternatives and the respective effects, as well as coming to terms with the concept that one can't have the whole thing. thinking about the human hindrance of having to exclude one factor with a view to gain another, humans will continually reach for a level of objectivity in their alternatives; they want to dispose of a number of the pain and difficulty that they experience from having to make those alternatives by detaching themselves emotionally from the alternatives they need to make. notwithstanding the truth of lifestyles mendacity in subjectivity, there may be a paradox shown here; that humans are nearly preset to attain for objectivity regardless of the ‘solution’ present within the other course: past subjectivity. To reach the ‘solution’ of existence, one have to first come to terms with the reality of life. Kierkegaard’s existential reality is subjectivity; for a human to keep in mind that subjectivity is the core of lifestyles then allows them to pursue and eventually understand the ‘answer’ to lifestyles. Subjectivity in itself is crucial to comprehend as a human, and as a end result, it also serves as a differentiation among the easy man and the smart guy. If the clever guy is being subjective, he knows that there may be a difference among subjectivity and objectivity. but, the handiest indication that he's being ‘absolutely subjective’ at a given point is that he objectively is aware of the difference among ‘objectivity’ and ‘subjectivity’. This understanding permits him to grasp the idea of the ‘solution’ to lifestyles at the same time as on the same time brings up the anomaly of most effective being subjective whilst being objective. In contrast, if the easy man is being subjective, he is absolutely being subjective by means of point of impulse and might now not be aware about it. accordingly the easy guy can't be considered to have reached the same existential fact as the clever guy. To be smart is a curse as well as a blessing, for the anomaly teaches him the importance of the existential truth, while at the identical time, prevents him from attaining it. Given Kierkegaard’s perception that the existential fact is subjectivity, that every one people in the end come to be at least barely objective and that people want to be barely goal with the intention to be subjective, then a paradox provides itself. If a human can not be subjective without being goal then this begs the question about whether or no longer a human attain a kingdom of pure subjectivity. in the global-historic view, there may be but a unmarried goal truth to any person occasion throughout history, but subjectivity indicates a unique, individual reality for anybody viewing it. since people can't objectively have a look at and assume over the past (with out first engaging in the impossible challenge of turning into God-like), humans are left to view the activities themselves from the prevailing, filling inside the gaps among objective statistics with subjective interpretations. these all assemble to subjective truths; each being the reality, but none being any greater or much less valid than the ultimate. by using being human, one is constrained by using the ‘world’ they've subjectively built; a global made with the subjective truths inspired by means of their personal thoughts, emotions and reports. but, as partly subjective existences in what can most effective be perceived as a simply subjective world, one need to ask if human beings can simply exist inside the equal ‘global’ as every person else and if the solution to that query changes the ‘solution’ to existence itself. This provides us with the final paradox; that that allows you to gain the ‘solution’ one have to be an goal and static entity, however people as an entire are subjective honestly through lifestyles. were one to ‘discover’ the so-known as ‘answer’ to life, one’s lifestyles might fundamentally alternate. however, as a right away result of locating that ‘answer’, this newly changed lifestyles is essentially a brand new existence in and of itself. This new life is at least slightly different from the vintage life and, as a result, has a new subjective fact to it. This efficaciously renders the previous ‘answer’ nugatory, possibly having by no means existed to begin with. This in itself proves that the ‘solution’ cannot be found inside the continuously energetic ‘lifestyles’, however only inside the static ‘death’ where the constant, static global is unaffected by using someone. no matter this, the ‘solution’ holds no meaning after loss of life and can not be communicated to the living resulting inside the same lack of ‘fact’. As a end result, I’ve discovered that I’m unable to submit my solution to this lifelong undertaking, and that to do so i'd must now not be considered ‘alive’. I make an apology and would like to request an extension; ideally to sometime inside the past due 2070’s. Cite This work>GET ANSWER