Aligning your methodology with your problem statement is critical when mapping Section 1 components to Section 2. Section 1 and Section 2 mirror each
other, so you must ensure consistency in your language and presentation of information, as well as the logical flow of your narrative. As noted previously, the
purpose of the doctoral project or dissertation-in-practice is derived from the problem statement, and each element of the purpose statement supports
addressing the problem statement. In the Nature of the Doctoral Project or Dissertation-in-Practice subsection, if used in your ADE Proposal and Manuscriipt
Template (school-specific), you will provide a summary of the methodology and design and include a brief summary of the data collection procedures and
analysis. You may also cite seminal work related to your selected methodology and design.
The questions support the problem and purpose of the Doctoral Project or Dissertation-in-Practice, which are strengthened by the clarification provided in the
Nature of the Doctoral Project or Dissertation-in-Practice section. These questions serve to provide direction for hypotheses (when applicable). The purpose
is for you to have a fully aligned and focused project.
Aligning the methodology to the problem statement and purpose also assists in achieving increased validity for your Doctoral Project or Dissertation-inPractice. For example, a problem that is testing the relationship between two variables requires a quantitative approach, while a problem that seeks context
is more appropriately examined through a qualitative approach. In fact, the verbiage used in the questions should be derived from the terms used in the
methodology, design, and methods.
Recall the following definitions and refer to Figure 4 for a refresher on the relationships among these terms.
Research paradigms, also known as worldviews, are the long-standing philosophical assumptions, principles, and tenets that guide particular and sometimes
prescriiptive protocol for systematic research that may differ by discipline. Examples include positivism/post-positivism, interpretivism/constructivism,
critical theory, and pragmatism.
Methodology is the system of methods commonly referred to as quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods.
Design refers to the assembly of choices for the techniques to be employed within a respective study that may include the research approach or
paradigmatic tradition such as a quasi-experimental design in quantitative research or phenomenology in qualitative research.
Methods are the systematic tools used to recruit, sample, collect, analyze, and/or interpret information. Think of methods as the tools and techniques used
for data collection and analysis. There are more methods than listed in the illustration.
Figure 4. Relationships among paradigm, methodology, design, and method.
When the project design is aligned to the problem statement, it ensures that the selected methods will actually measure what they are intended to measure
and validates your project topic and design.
Perhaps one of the biggest challenges encountered in preparing Section 1 is ensuring the selected design and method align with the nature of your intended
project. This accomplished via the selection of the appropriate design. A design is a plan crafted to answer questions, designed to address a problem—either
philosophical or of practice. Your design should encompass a particular paradigm and include the method that will dictate how, why, and what type of data
will be collected and analyzed. You may continue to develop and refine your statement of the problem in this course under the direction of your Chair.
A critical review of your problem statement, purpose statement, and nature of the doctoral project or dissertation-in-practice, (if required by your school)
should focus on the alignment of these foundational subsections. Recall Figure 5, introduced in Week 1, which illustrates alignment and coherence of
practice-based problem, purpose, and questions.
Figure 5. Alignment and coherence of problem, purpose, and questions
This foundation will provide the structure used later in Section 2 and the pattern for presenting your findings and recommendations in Section 3 after you
collect/acquire your data (if applicable).
You will examine resources associated with the conceptual or theoretical framework next week. However, understand that the conceptual or theoretical
framework should be the foundation that helps link and inform the problem, scope of project, research questions, methodology, and design (Grant & Osanloo,
2014).
Continue to investigate the Course Resources, leverage the librarians to help support your research, and contact the writing or statistics coaches in the
Academic Success Center for assistance in building your Doctoral Project or Dissertation-in-Practice components. Keep building out the ADE Proposal and
Manuscriipt Template (school-specific) subsection by subsection in accordance with your Chair’s feedback.
References
Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating a blueprint for your
“house.” Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26.


Week 4 – Assignment: Develop Purpose Statement
Instructions
Continue to work on your draft based on the requirements listed in your ADE Proposal and Manuscriipt Template (school-specific). Be sure to consider and
implement any feedback and direction provided by your Chair. Do NOT submit your draft to the Doctoral Record until instructed to do so by your Chair.
If you are still working on the topic, problem statement, questions, or key terms continue to work on those. The next subsections to focus on drafting are your
Purpose Statement and Nature of the Doctoral Project or Dissertation-in-Practice (if applicable in your ADE Proposal and Manuscriipt Template (schoolspecific)). Your focus should be on defining the purpose of your study and providing a summary of the nature of the doctoral project or dissertation-inpractice, in the respective subsections. Concentrate on developing clear alignment between the previously developed subsections in Section 1. Your project

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer