Review the details for the Qualitative Study Evaluation assignment below. See 3-1: Qualitative Study Evaluation in the Week 3 outline for submission instructions. Locate a qualitative study that may assist you in answering the clinical question you posed during Week 1. If you are unable to find a qualitative study that answers your question, locate a qualitative study on a topic of your choice. In a one to two page paper: • Write a brief description of your study. • Categorize the study as an Ethnographic, Grounded Theory, Phenomenological/Hermeneutic study and offer support the rationale for your choice. • Evaluate the study, based on the questions listed in Box 6.18 of the Melnyk & Fineout- Overholt text: o Aretheresultsvalid/trustworthyandcredible? o Areimplicationsoftheresearchstated? o Whatistheeffectonthereader? o Whatweretheresultsofthestudy? o Howdoestheresearcheridentifythestudyapproach? o Isthesignificance/importanceofthestudyexplicit? o Isthesamplingstrategyclearandguidedbystudyneeds? o Aredatacollectionproceduresclear? o Aredataanalysisproceduresdescribed? • Include the reference for your research article and at least one additional reference. See the Qualitative Study Evaluation Grading Rubric in the Course Syllabus or Course Overview for specific grading criteria. All direct quotations and other sources used must be credited using APA Style®. The topic is How many homeless people suffer from mental illness. Can we affect the amount of homelessness by getting this demographic mental healthcare. Below is a copy of the rubric Quantitative Study Evaluation Homework Grading Rubric Locate a quantitative study that may assist you in answering the clinical question you posed during week one. If you are unable to find a quantitative study that answers your question, locate a quantitative study on a topic of your choice. Criteria Comments Possible Score Student Score Write a brief summary of the study. Categorize your study as a Case-Control, Cohort, or Randomized Controlled Study Support the rationale for your choice. 6 Use the questions in Box 5-1 of the Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt text to evaluate the study: Why was the study done? What is the sample size? What is the independent variable? What is the dependent variable? Are the measurements of major variables valid and reliable? How were the data analyzed? Were there any untoward events during the conduct of the study? Do the results fit with previous research in the area? What does this research mean for clinical practice? (Two points per question) 18 4. Cite at least two scholarly resources (1 point per source) 2 5. Writing skills- grammar, spelling, format, APA citations, maximum two pages 3 Possible Score 29 NUR 310 SP18 Last revised 4/2/2018 © Hondros College of Nursing 10 of 19 Qualitative Study Evaluation Grading Rubric Find a qualitative study that may assist you in answering the clinical question you posed during week one. If you are unable to find a qualitative study that answers your question, locate a qualitative study on a topic of your choice. Criteria Comments Possible Score Student Score 1.Provide an introductory paragraph: a. Write a brief description of your study. b. Categorize the study as an Ethnographic, Grounded Theory, Phenomenological/Hermeneutic c. Support the rationale for your choice. (2 points per criterion) 6 2. Evaluate the study, based on the questions listed in Box 6.1 of the Melnyk & Fineout- Overholt text: Are the results valid/trustworthy and credible? Are implications of the research stated? What is the effect on the reader? What were the results of the study? How does the researcher identify the study approach? Is the significance/importance of the study explicit? Is the sampling strategy clear and guided by study needs? Are data collection procedures clear? Are data analysis procedures described? (2 points per question) 18 3. Cite at least two scholarly resources (1 point per source) 2 4. Writing skills- grammar, spelling, format, APA citations, maximum two pages 3 Possible Score

Sample Solution

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.