Use the data to construct a model that predicts the tax assessment value assigned to medical office buildings with specific characteristics.
o Construct a scatter plot in Excel with FloorArea as the independent variable and AssessmentValue as the dependent variable. Insert the bivariate linear regression equation and r^2 in your graph. Do you observe a linear relationship between the 2 variables?
o Use Excel’s Analysis ToolPak to conduct a regression analysis of FloorArea and AssessmentValue. Is FloorArea a significant predictor of AssessmentValue?
o Construct a scatter plot in Excel with Age as the independent variable and AssessmentValue as the dependent variable. Insert the bivariate linear regression equation and r^2 in your graph. Do you observe a linear relationship between the 2 variables?
o Use Excel’s Analysis ToolPak to conduct a regression analysis of Age and Assessment Value. Is Age a significant predictor of AssessmentValue?
Construct a multiple regression model.
o Use Excel’s Analysis ToolPak to conduct a regression analysis with AssessmentValue as the dependent variable and FloorArea, Offices, Entrances, and Age as independent variables. What is the overall fit r^2? What is the adjusted r^2?
o Which predictors are considered significant if we work with α=0.05? Which predictors can be eliminated?
o What is the final model if we only use FloorArea and Offices as predictors?
o Suppose our final model is:
o AssessedValue = 115.9 + 0.26 x FloorArea + 78.34 x Offices
o What would be the assessed value of a medical office building with a floor area of 3500 sq. ft., 2 offices, that was built 15 years ago? Is this assessed value consistent with what appears in the database?
Being able to wholly de-list species from the Convention should only be done in cases where the species has first been transferred from Appendix I to II and there has been additional evidence to prove that this will not pose threats to its existence. This should not be taken lightly, as moving a species from having the protection of Appendix II to having none at all is a significant change. Overall, the difficult conditions of down-listing and de-listing are easily warranted by the importance of the consequences attached to them, illustrating the success that the FLC have had on the Convention. The introduction of split-listing species has the possibility of improving the effectiveness of the Convention. If the species as a whole does not meet the requirements of Appendix I, the sub-population, which may require increased protection, would not receive it. Therefore, split-listing introduces a method to protect sub-populations that are particularly endangered. This mechanism results in the reduction of contentiousness at the CoP for the specific species. Although the theoretical advantages are evident, the practical implementation appears challenging. The origins of samples of the more protected sub-population would probably be concealed, so that they could be traded into areas where the population is not as severely protected, therefore demonstrating the obstacles in limiting their trade. The enforcement officials would need to be informed and active in detecting which sub-population is being traded, which would require new and creative implementation methods, as current techniques are not suitable. The CoP itself expressly states that split-listing should be avoided due to the “enforcement problems it creates.” Through this acknowledgement, it is evident that such provision should only be used in extreme circumstances, when split-listing is the only way for a threatened sub-population to attain the required protection. Notwithstanding its enforcement issues, the CoP have introduced it because of the necessity for its presence in exceptional conditions.>GET ANSWER