Ricardo, a citizen of Italy, was married to a Canadian and together they had a son. Unfortunately, the marriage didn’t work out so Ricardo went back to his home country of Italy. As a result of not maintaining his Canadian residency he lost his status as a permanent resident of Canada pursuant to 46 (1) (b) of IRPA.
Ricardo returned to Calgary often to visit his son and took him on various hunting trips to reconnect. Upon entering Canada 5 years ago, he neglected to declare a hunting rifle for his son which used to be his father’s. The officer discovered the firearm and questioned Ricardo regarding his intentions of importing the gun. Feeling embarrassed and irresponsible, Ricardo explained to the officer that he didn’t realize he was committing an offence and that it would never happen again. Despite Ricardo’s explanation, his case was referred to the Immigration Division. Ricardo was arrested and charged with a summary conviction. He paid a fine and was returned to his home country. Ricardo did nothing about this conviction.
Five years later, Ricardo attempted to return to Calgary for his son’s wedding. He applied for an Electronic Travel Authorization (e-TA), but it was denied. What does Ricardo need to do to come to Canada for his son’s wedding?
address the following:
1. Find the relevant criminal code in the Criminal Code of Canada
2. Specify the inadmissibility act imposed
3. Explain why Ricardo is not allowed to enter Canada
4. Ricardo has retained you for your advice. He wants to know if it would be possible for him to return to Canada for the wedding. What advice would you give him? Which application(s) would he need to submit in order to overcome his inadmissibility?
A standout amongst the most notorious pictures of the Roman Empire is that of the Roman officer; a visual portrayal of the Empire's capacity and its readiness to practice it. Inquisitively, the well known picture of the Roman trooper isn't completely precise, in that the glorified picture that most hold is solitary and consistent in nature, yet the Roman armed force was definitely not, experiencing numerous adjustments in gear and creation all through the rule of old Rome. Truth be told, couple of things continued as before as the years went on; put something aside for the Roman armed force's convention of teach and request, the reception of new strategies and hierarchical structures was a characterizing highlight of the Roman military, and here falsehoods the wellspring of the Roman armed force's superiority. The Roman armed force's capacity originated from its versatility, which enabled it to respond to new difficulties introduced by adversaries, and from its custom of strict train, which brought about better prepared powers with expanded strategic and vital abilities. The impacts of these elements can be found in the numerous battles in which Rome's powers taken an interest, with the Romans adjusting their gear, strategies, and arrangements, and embracing those of its adversaries, alongside their incredible teach being critical supporters of their success. In Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline, Montesquieu expresses that, "the condition which contributed most to render the Romans experts of the world was, that having fought progressively against all countries, they constantly disavowed their own particular uses when they discovered better" (20), in this way viably recognizing one of the Roman armed force's essential wellsprings of power. Dissimilar to a significant number of the armed forces of the time, the Roman's had no misgivings about changing their own particular practices so as to all the more adequately battle a foe, or to try and receive those of different countries that they considered to be powerful. This made it so the Roman armed force ended up not simply more experienced with each experience, but rather better in any number of useful routes, with changes to their own techniques and selection of foe strategies and gear. At last, the Roman's military may was so extraordinary on the grounds that it was made out of the qualities of each country they had vanquished. This goodness of flexibility was found in a portion of its most punctual cases with Romulus embracing the Sabines' buckler, which was bigger and in this manner gave more assurance than the Argive buckler that he beforehand used. While to the advanced peruser this may appear to be a long way from a progressive thought, it was at the time, and accordingly surrendered an excellent favorable position to the Romans. As commented by Montesquieu and deciphered in A Treatise on the Science of War and Fortification, "It is amazing, that the countries vanquished by the Romans never asked into the reasons for their rehashed routs; however drove forward in the utilization of their weapons and foundations to the last snapshot of their political presence" (O'Connor, 71). Clearly, this regulation of digestion and adjustment was genuinely one of a kind for now is the right time, and along these lines enabled the Roman Legions to ceaselessly advance, with new strategies, hardware, and preparing. A considerably more noteworthy demonstration of the flexibility of the Romans was that they didn't just absorb or adjust to the advancements of the armed forces subsequent to having vanquished them, however would do as such all through a crusade also, gaining from each annihilation keeping in mind the end goal to eventually take triumph back. A decent case of this was after experiencing the elephants of Pyrrhus, where the new creatures steered the Roman rangers, "their steeds, previously they got close to the creatures, were alarmed and fled with their riders" (Plutarch, XVII.3), yet the Romans enabled this to happen just once. accordingly, "they initially provided the shortcoming of their mounted force by taking without end the harnesses from the ponies, [â€¦] and subsequently by blending velites with their cavalry appropriate" (Montesquieu, 55). The Roman's procedure of adjustment and appropriation demonstrated clear outcomes on the combat zone over and over. Thusly, numerous a battle that appeared to be lost at first was eventually recovered by them, "watchful to determine in what regards their adversary may have some prevalence over them; they instantly made a move as needs be" (Montesquieu, 54), and consequently turn the tides to support them once more. to put it plainly, an extraordinary factor in the Roman armed force's prosperity was its convention of steady advancement: on the off chance that somebody was improving, do what they are doing. Along these lines, the Roman armed force consistently developed into a power that had the best qualities of all forces in the zone; as condensed by Josephus: "If any country appreciated a specific favorable position [â€¦] they without a moment's delay benefited themselves of the same. They didn't disregard to give themselves Numidian steeds, Cretan bowmen, Balearic slingmen, and Rhodian ships. In fine, no country at any point arranged for war with so much judiciousness, or conveyed it on with so much dauntlessness" (Montesquieu, 56). The Roman's practiced another extraordinary preferred standpoint over their peers: train. Huge numbers of the armed forces of their opportunity being made out of non-proficient fighters, and those that had standing armed forces had them made out of brutes and undisciplined troops. All things considered, it would frequently come to fruition that the Romans asserted triumph notwithstanding being horribly dwarfed, "[Roman] troops continually being the better restrained, it was likely, even in the most grievous battles, that they would rally to some degree, or that the adversary would some place be tossed into clutter [and] in spite of the fact that overborne before all else [â€¦], they at long last wrested triumph from their hands" (Montesquieu, 54). This awesome train was absolutely critical to the Roman armed force's prosperity, thus it was imparted from the minute that a man would enroll. They started preparing at military schools, expanding physical quality, smoothness, and weapons taking care of, with the most renowned of these being the Campus Martius in old Rome. All of this added to the Roman warrior turning into the best form of himself, which thus brought about a more prominent esprit de corps and pride, and at last a more noteworthy ability to battle. This exchanged straightforwardly to the combat zone, where the Roman powers would once in a while break arrangement notwithstanding being given a staggering adversary, and whose developments were hence great and sufficiently versatile to defeat these same foes. The teach that Roman troopers showed originated from two components, one being the danger of discipline, and the other being Roman pride, with each being viable in their own right. The pride that Roman's felt in their place in the military was a powerful part in keeping up arrange among the troops by being deterrent; a Roman trooper did not wish to spurn his obligation as a result of his pride. This could be found in the uncommonness of Roman departures, which came about because of the way that "troopers drawn from the chest of a people so pleased, so haughty, so certain of overwhelming different people groups, could little think so far underestimating themselves as to stop to be Romans" (Montesquieu, 53). This pride went past maintenance and expanded assurance and battle viability, as this pride enabled a Roman fighter to have faith in himself and his faithful comrades all the more. The other wellspring of Roman military train originated from the risk of discipline for the individuals who were deficient. This started from the soonest long stretches of a fighter's vocation; when execution was inadmissible they were rebuffed in like manner, thus it turned into that "beating to authorize train was a piece of a trooper's lifestyle" (Saller, 136). Despite whipping turning into the standard for these officers, there existed undeniably serious disciplines that filled in as extraordinary obstructions for the most outrageous instances of a warrior's offense, the most well known of these being the pulverization of a unit. As depicted by Polybius:>GET ANSWER