Right-wing Hindu violence in India, targeted against Muslims, has erupted all across the country as it approaches the anniversary of the Mumbai attacks. You are the chief intelligence analyst at the American Embassy in India and it is your task to craft the brief informing Washington of what is the main motivation behind the extremist eruption. You must decide whether you are going to focus more on a cultural argument or more on a spatial-territorial argument, knowing that subsequent U.S. reaction and policy will be affected by your report. Research these Hindu-Muslim tensions and analyze the core root causes of this conflict. Do not for this briefing focus on any prescriptions or policy measures to be enacted: as an intelligence officer, your job is to simply break down the situation and give that evidence/advice to your superiors in Washington. What they need from you is your expert in-the-field analysis about what is causing this violence: civilization or geography?
Issue Statement There is a lot of investigation into strength in youngsters, regardless of whether they are housed or destitute. Be that as it may, there is less research about versatility in grown-ups, regardless of whether they are housed or destitute. This does not sound good to me. Youngsters' prosperity, which incorporates their strength, is specifically related with that of the grown-ups in their families. Ladies right now gain 60 pennies for each dollar a man acquires with a more extensive ethnic pay hole (CCH, page 3). Families with kids make up thirty-five percent of the destitute populace, with the staying sixty-five percent of the destitute populace being single people (CCH, page 1). Get information on #'s going by single guardians, particularly female-headed families. As indicated by the City of Chicago 2007 Point in Time Count, the racial socioeconomics of the destitute populace were: African American: 75 percent; White: 16 percent; Latino: 6 percent (CCH, FAQ). Quality even with affliction is a standout amongst the most vital attributes you can have. Difficulties and frustrations are inescapable throughout everyday life. Flexibility is one of the keys to life fulfillment. Versatility can help counteract gloom, improves connections, encourages us manage sudden and startling difficulties, and additionally those we foresee and can't maintain a strategic distance from. It additionally defends us against long haul difficulties.Given this reality I chose to examine if versatility lessens negative impacts of vagrancy in grown-ups and in their change subsequent to getting to be housed. The data I find can be helpful for those working with grown-ups who are destitute and those creation the progress from vagrancy to lodging. Philosophy I composed 10 addresses dependent on the hypothesis found in a writing audit on flexibility. I talked with five specialists in the field of vagrancy: Erin Ryan MSW, the Executive Director of Lincoln Park Community Shelter (LPCS) ; Ms. Jen Patterson, Director of Development and Communications at Housing Opportunities for Women (HOW); Mr. Steven Skovensky, Ms. Natalie Hutchinson, and Ms. Ann Birhle, are Resident Services Managers at Mercy Housing Lakefront. LPCS, HOW and Mercy Housing are situated in Chicago. Each of the five interviewees have something like five years working with the destitute and those housed subsequent to being destitute. I picked Mr. Skovensky, Ms. Patterson, Ms. Hutchinson and Ms. Birhle on the grounds that in the wake of working with them from roughly 2000-2003. (I at present work with Ms. Hutchinson, Ms. Birhle and Mr. Skovensky.) reference I asked Ms. Ryan in the wake of getting to be familiar with some of Lincoln Park Community Shelter's alumni. I solicited an Executive Director from another safe house in Chicago however there was no reaction from her. [Ms. Ryan's telephone meet kept going 30 minutes, because of an earlier responsibility; she later addressed inquiries sent by email. Ms. Patterson's meeting kept going a hour at her office. Mr. Skovensky's and Ms. Birhle's meetings kept going around 40 minutes in their workplaces. Ms. Hutchinsons' meeting kept going a hour in her office.] commentaries The inquiries I asked every individual were: 1) their meaning of flexibility; 2) if strong customers carry on uniquely in contrast to the individuals who are less versatile; 3) if flexibility can be educated; 4) if flexibility can be instructed in a troublesome circumstance; 5) the qualities and restrictions or inadequacies the customers have; 6) if people demonstrate strength in various ways; 7) social, racial or ethnic contrasts in how flexibility is appeared; 8) how their associations work with customers/occupants to learn flexibility; 9) if strength can facilitate the adverse impacts of vagrancy and the change to being housed; 10) if there was anything vital I didn't get some information about Meeting Summary Everybody's meanings of versatility concur with every others' and mirror writing. Precedents of strength given included: the capacity to adjust to one's conditions, the capacity to advance when looked with difficulties and additionally boundaries, which are distinctive for everybody and have different layers, similar to occupations, families, et cetera (Patterson, Ryan); the capacity to drive forward and bob back under extraordinary conditions and beat outrageous obstructions; capacity to recuperate and bounce back from troublesome or awful encounters (Skovensky); a capacity to recoup and bounce back from troublesome or horrible encounters and gain from them and make positive change (Hutchinson); Ms. Patterson made reference to that somebody's informal community, which enables individuals to be stronger; that emotionally supportive network vanishing is the most exceedingly awful thing that occurs before somebody goes to HOW. Individuals need to utilize their aptitudes and encouraging group of people to explore and modify. The flexibility piece – the capacity to move and change effectively — is critical. The strong individual has a less demanding time since life is continually evolving. Hindrances may incorporate any type of injury, similar to viciousness, misfortune, habit, psychological well-being emergencies, detainment, getting to be destitute, and the general wellbeing framework (being sick and not having protection). Essentially one of the enormous things of flexibility is beating what might cripple the vast majority (Skovensky). Reactions shifted when members were inquired as to whether stronger customers carry on uniquely in contrast to the individuals who are less versatile. Those less flexible may make a few strides in reverse or not push ahead in a way they figured they could. The individual may move from the asylum to lodging, discovered they weren't as prepared as they thought, and move once more into the safe house. A few customers may require more help, for example, a caseworker in an on location office or somebody guaranteeing they take their meds every day or need transportation day by day (Patterson). Erin saw that frequently the hardest thing to defeat is a man's generalizations of what vagrancy is. LPCS staff experiences what appears to a disavowal framework set up. More taught individuals regularly act like they're superior to other people. Individuals are some of the time reluctant to help until the point that protections are broken. It's critical to enable individuals to grapple with it amid what Ms. Ryan called a sorrow procedure, which some handle superior to other people. Some are all the more ready to arrange, are available to proposal, willing to take guidance, more liberal and converse with individuals; they have more human associations. The individuals who are more segregated have a more troublesome time. This incorporates individuals managing perpetual diseases, regardless of whether physical or psychological maladjustments. Alleviating variables can confound things for individuals, with the affirmation they require help and the eagerness to acknowledge it being essential. This is particularly valid with enslavement. This likewise mirrors the writing on versatility. which? Mr. Skovensky specified two things that emerge for him: 1) the individuals who seem stronger appear to have a component of utilizing humor as a way of dealing with stress; they appeared to giggle, grin, relatively incongruent with their encounters. You'd think they'd be totally unsettled however they could giggle and grin and continue advancing. 2) Using their imagination; utilizing craftsmanship, as well as writing to narrative their experience. One individual in the photography assemble saying it improved him feel about his life and his issues; might be more about confidence than flexibility however. Someone sharing their encounters in their composition enlivened others in the composition gathering; it helps the essayist and the group of onlookers (Skovensky). This reflected what Smith and her partners found. Stronger individuals don't appear to be as stuck in past harmed or soiled down. They can move with the punches somewhat better. Stronger individuals don't customize things to such an extent, don't state that negative things are being coordinated particularly at them; they can contextualize things better. it's simpler to request help since they don't think about things literally. They can depend on accessible assets all the more effortlessly, feel to a greater extent a feeling of network, and contribution (Hutchinson). Ms. Ryan and Ms. Patterson trust that the fundamental standards and ideas of flexibility can be educated. In any case, conferring that data; individuals must will incorporate that data. A few people say need to be guided however the most one can do is spread out the alternatives accessible so the customer can settle on their choices from that point. As Ms. Patterson stated, customers must do it for themselves. Mr. Skovensky trusts that strength may have more to do with identity. Strength appears to be more similar to a character quality or identity engrained as a part of our identity than an expertise. Which paper is this like? Methods for dealing with stress, which include particular procedures for managing issues or concerns, are aptitudes that can be instructed. Precedents – understanding your emotionally supportive network and the job it plays; understanding assets accessible; seeing how to process outrage in a way not negative to you or others; understanding it's alright to state no to circumstances, don't need to be everything to all individuals; just thing one can possess is your own behavior, not others' activities. Strength, then again, appears to be more impalpable by they way you can quantify and clarify. Accordingly it is difficult to portray who is versatile and who isn't. Like Ms. Birhle, Ms. Hutchinson trusts versatility can be empowered yet requires a specific sort of standpoint that can be displayed for individuals. Versatility originates from a specific method for taking a gander at the world, a specific point of view, which can be instructed. Individuals who are stronger feel to a greater degree a "we" rather than "us versus them". Anybody can instruct anything to somebody willing to learn. In the event that somebody isn't prepared for the change, at that point why much think about it? >GET ANSWER