The Compromise of 1877 ended the hotly contested 1876 presidential election (only 1 electoral college vote divided them) between Hayes, a Republican, and Tilden, a southern Democrat and also ended Reconstruction. In exchange for removing the last of the federal troops (which provided federal government oversight to make sure that the former Confederate states implemented the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments (a.k.a. The Civil War Amendments) and which was designed by the Radical Republicans to also punish the South for starting the Civil War by seceding (breaking away) from the Union because they had incorrectly assumed that Lincoln was going to abolish slavery upon becoming president in 1860), Hayes got the W.H. Although Lincoln thought slavery was bad prior to the Civil War, he did not publicly express a desire to abolish it until approximately 3 years later, with the Emancipation Proclamation which he announced during the Civil War (1861-65). He declared that all slaves should be set free in the South with this Proclamation; however, it was ignored in the South (this is why Juneteenth (June 19th) is celebrated–Black slaves in Galveston, TX, etc., were informed that they were free, app. 2 years after The Emancipation Proclamation–“Union Maj. Gen. Gordon Granger and his troops arrived at Galveston on June 19, 1865, with news that the war had ended and that the enslaved were now free. That was more than two months after Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered to Union Gen. Ulysses S. Grant in Virginia.” (https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-holidays-juneteenth-lifestyle-f8648a23f2f6bdb2db3d648458828651): https://www.npr.org/2011/02/21/133372512/tracing-president-lincolns-thoughts-on-slavery.
Getting back to ending Reconstruction, the former Confederate states had to also swear allegiance to the Union and to implementing the The Civil War Amendments before formally becoming part of the Union again. Those who implemented the 3 Civil War Amendments sooner and had sworn allegiance sooner were occupied for less time. Without federal oversight, southern states were free to enact laws (Black Codes: “…laws that required African Americans to sign yearly labour contracts and in other ways sought to limit the freedmen’s economic options and reestablish plantation discipline. African Americans strongly resisted the implementation of these measures, and they seriously undermined Northern support for Johnson’s policies” (https://www.britannica.com/event/Reconstruction-United-States-history) and later Jim Crow laws) with Andrew Johnson’s support and with the former Confederates regaining control over the South and over the Democratic party; these laws treated Blacks and other racial/ethnic minorities as second-class citizens. These laws were designed to circumvent the Civil War Amendments, thus denying these minorities equality in reality. For example, The Black Codes of 1865 and 1866 essentially re-enslaved Blacks as these Codes permitted any Black males who did not have jobs to be charged with vagrancy and to then be placed in prisons where they would be leased out by companies to partially rebuild the South: https://www.britannica.com/topic/black-code This practice was known as “convict leasing”; some form of “convict leasing” continues today in some prisons. With The Compromise of 1877, the federal government had agreed to rebuild roads and railroads, which had been destroyed during The Civil War, and to build schools. The Supreme Court gave these southern states legal cover for their laws with their rulings which kept the Civil Rights Act of 1875 from being implemented and the Supreme Court ruling of 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson, which ruled that “separate but equal” was legal as long as the separate accommodations were equal, which they were not. https://www.npr.org/2011/02/24/133960082/the-supreme-courts-failure-to-protect-civil-rights
Occasionally, the Supreme Court, especially in the 20th century, has undone a few of their prior rulings. Plessy was essentially overturned with the S.C. ruling of 1947 Mendez v. Westminster and 1954 Brown v. Board of Education.
Instructions: After reading the Reconstruction (Post Civil War) ppt., in addition to the website and video link below, please tell me what the failures of Reconstruction were, more specifically, how these failures caused the approximately 100-year period of Jim Crow laws in the South. (Also, if you are able to–not required–a) take the “Impossible Literacy Test (Louisiana)” (google these key words; then google, “Answers to the Impossible Literacy Test”); and b) watch XIII, a documentary on Netflix alleging how slavery exists in the modern-day criminal justice system and thus the need, some contend, for criminal justice reform):
http://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/reconstruction
The Civil War and its Legacy video: http://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/reconstruction/videos/the-civil-war-and-its-legacy

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer