This discussion is the first in a series in this course in which you will focus your post and responses within your specialization. To make this possible in the course room, label your initial post with the name of your specialization (addiction, education, general, or industrial and organizational psychology). On the subject line, place the name of your specialization, then your name.
Think through the reasons that motivated you to enroll in the Capella program for a PhD in psychology. For your initial post in this discussion, answer the following questions:
Why are you here? Describe your primary motivations for pursuing this program.
What elements in your background, experience, and thinking have led you to take this direction?
Which learning model best describes you right now, considering the scholar-practitioner model?
How do you think your learning in this program will be different from your learning in your master’s program? Choose a specific situation that you recall from your master’s program, and illustrate the differences you expect.
What are you trying to become? Think about what you have thought about for your future, and reflect on what you have read this week.
When you have earned your doctorate, what will it enable you to do that you cannot do now?
What will it mean to you?
How will it change your contributions to society and community?
How will you make sure that you can accomplish your goal? Consider what you have learned this week about the requirements for earning a PhD, about the elements of the program, and about the other aspects of your life. Consider the time management action plan you prepared as part of the second study this week, as well as the recommendations in Chapter 11 of your Graduate Savvy text. What will it take for you to succeed? To what extent are you prepared to take charge of your learning, to challenge yourself, and to handle all of the time commitments required?
Include at lease 2 references
Dispassionate authenticity, the hypothesis of reality which was created by Plato. It expresses that the unmistakable universe of things is a presentation, like shadows on the divider. While the unmistakable universe of points of interest is incredible, the Theory of Forms involve the imperceptible yet obvious reality and are genuine. Plato thought about that the brain is the one thing that can get to the ageless truth of facts, the domain of the Forms throwing the unmistakable world. The acclaimed purposeful anecdote of the cavern, Plato recommends that people just realize this present reality as shadows of the genuine articles they see associating on a divider. Plato's character Socrates recommends that information isn't discernment in such a case that "seeing" is comparable to "knowing," at that point when one doesn't see a thing, he never again has the information on what he sees. Observation on this view can be characterized as a moment "marvel" in which sense organs participate in cooperations with outer articles through the demonstration of seeing. Outer items animate real faculties through such collaboration from which a kind of observation � shading, taste, smell, or contact � is experienced. At the point when the demonstration of seeing stops to happen, Plato guarantees that on the view that information is discernment, we never again access the information on the apparent articles. Taking everything into account, Plato sees discernment and conceptualization of observation as discrete ideas. He unequivocally recognizes the hole between the exact instant of discernment and the resulting procedure of observation in which tactile improvements are associated with tangible classes. What's more, creatures that are unequipped for thinking are likewise brought into the world with detectable quality simply like a man. On the off chance that a man and a creature were to have a similar ability to see in their newborn child organize, discernment can be characterized as something without thinking. Along these lines Plato's perspective on discernment is at last non-conceptualist � one that thinks about observation as negligible tactile consciousness of outer improvements in illustrative substance without ensuing conceptualization of the sensation. As per Plato, observation and conceptualization of recognition are two separate ideas living in various domains, constrained by various elements. >GET ANSWER