- How does the poem by Langston Hughes, from which the play A Raisin in the Sun takes its name, relate to the themes in the play?
What happens to a dream deferred?
Does it dry up
like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore—
And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over—
like a syrupy sweet?
Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.
Or does it explode?
- What sort of statement does Lorraine Hansberry (the author) seem to be making about race? Does she make more than one statement? If so, do these statements conflict with each other?
- Of the major characters in A Raisin in the Sun (Beneatha, Walter Lee, Mama, Ruth), choose one which you would consider to be a protagonist and which to be an antagonist and explain why.
The Glass Menagerie
- Of the main characters (Tom, Laura, or Amanda), which face life most unrealistically? Does this contribute to the themes of illusion versus reality featured in the play?
- Discuss the symbol of the glass menagerie. What does it represent? Does it represent the same things throughout the play, or does its meaning change?
- What life was like for Minnie Wright when John Wright was alive? How do the props in the play come to represent their life together, and the motive for his murder?
- How might the circumstances of the character Minnie Wright compare to Mrs. Mallard from The Story of an Hour or the narrator from The Yellow Wallpaper?
So as to evaluate how these adjustments in the cerebrum influence one's capacity to give educated assent, we will concentrate on what the necessities for educated assent are. Educated assent inside a restorative setting, includes three key parts: The patient has ability to assent Sufficient applicable data has been gotten by the patient (NB this isn't really tradable with satisfactory important data being given by the doctor) Assent has been given deliberately and free of intimidation Every one of the three are important and mutually adequate conditions. Implying that a factor which debilitates either part will debilitate the self-rule of the patient with respect to their treatment. Limit is maybe the segment that first rings a bell when examining assent. It identifies with a particular choice about a particular course of treatment, circumstance and conditions. For example a patient could be capable to choose what sort of painkiller they might want whenever gave the reactions yet not skilled enough to remove an appendage on the off chance that they experience the ill effects of body dysmorphia. This limit is gotten from regulating and evaluative qualities. Which would require the human services proficient to make a judgment dependent on an evaluation and identifying with a degree to standards of therapeutic practice and society. It isn't totally regulating as in the patient could have legitimate decision regardless of whether the said decision isn't 'right' inside the benchmarks of their general public/settin>GET ANSWER