LSTD 2106 Legal Environment of Business Critical Paper 2 (Torts)—Assignment Guide Spring 2019
Instructions. Use the IRAC process to analyze issues of liability in the hypothetical case below. Specifically, you should: (1) Identify the legal issues (Issue); (2) Identify and describe the legal rules that apply to these issues (Rule); (3) Synthesize compelling information such as facts, legal definitions and/or general principles of law to discuss the liability of the defendant (Analysis); and (4) Summarize your legal conclusions on the issue of liability (Conclusion). Your answers should use critical legal analysis and correct legal terminology, and should be supported by facts and law. The paper should be of sufficient length to address all of the issues involved. Your instructor will use the Critical Paper 2 grading rubric to score the final draft of your paper. Additional details concerning the scoring of Critical Paper 2 are available in the course syllabus.
n small before it became small. Moreover, if things only became smaller, and not larger, eventually everything would be miniscule. And if it was the other way around, where everything only became larger, and not smaller, everything would eventually be one thing, because everything would have joined together. If this were the case then we would notice that things only become smaller, shorter, or uglier, and never their opposites, or vice versa. Socrates shows that things do transition from two opposites, by referencing to observable examples. He contrasts this to death, and claims that there has to be a cycle of becoming alive and becoming dead, or else everything would become dead, or vice versa. The analogies that Socrates uses are applicable to every corporeal thing in the universe. Everything is either large or small, tall or short, etcetera. He claims that there is a process of becoming from its opposite (e.g. something becoming larger from being small), and that this process is cyclical. For if everythi>GET ANSWER