De Jong, P., & Berg, I. K. (2007). Learner’s workbook for Interviewing for solutions 3rd (Reference for assignment).
Assessment aim The aim of this assessment is to assess your ability to interview in the style of either/both a post-modernist approach or Motivational Interviewing approach. It will also assess your ability to critically self-reflect on your performance. A vital competency in counselling is an ability to recognise areas of competence – Assessment details and tasks 6 areas that need further development against a solid theoretical understanding of the model and the skills.
Tasks Task 1: Recording Record a counselling session (with interviewee consent) demonstrating your usage of one or a combination/integration of both approaches learnt in this course. Write out the transcript of your responses and the times they occur.
Task 2: Analysis Provide your analysis of the following areas (using the same format as below). Note that the transcript sections and start and stop times are essential. It is required that when commenting on a skill or section, that you put the start stop time and transcript section as a footnote in the place you are discussing it. If start and finish times relative to the skills in discussion are not included with skill discussions, these sections will not be marked.
1. Introduction to the assignment, including indicating the model/s you are using (1 paragraph)
2. Summarise the client’s story (1 paragraph)
3. Identify and critique interventions (including intervention sets) that you used which are congruent with the approach/es.
4. Identify and discuss interventions (including intervention sets) in the interview that are not congruent with the selected model/s, including analysis on any other areas that may need attention.
5. Summarise the process of the entire interview commenting on where it was congruent or not congruent with the selected model/s.
6. Summarise key learning highlighting what you did that was helpful, what was less helpful, and provide constructive suggestions for what you might have done instead of the less helpful interactions.
Terminology Intervention: A single intentional skill used by the counsellor. Example: The scaling question. Intervention set: A set of skills used by the counsellor. For example, the scaling question with its accompanying follow up questions. Process: How the interview happens. Process may involve identifying whether the interview appeared congruent with the model process or not, or perhaps if there was a process issue such as the client dominating the conversation
Assessment details and tasks 7 the counsellor remains generally silent or passive. It is not focussed on interventions or skill sets, but on the broader process.
Example of segments from part 3 and 4 of an analysis including example times: My use of the scaling question were generally congruent with the model. At 9:15 I used a scaling of confidence question, and utilised scaling follow up questions about how come the client is so high, what helped, and what might help the client go higher (9:20-12:23). This scaling question and the follow up questions were congruent with those recommended by Berg (1996, p.23). My use of the miracle question was a congruent intervention but delivered in a problematic manner. The miracle question is recommended to have a number of features including a reduction of verbal pace, an introduction to the question as being different or unusual, have pauses to help prepare the client for a transition from problem to solution thinking. It also has a structure of when the miracle will occur, what happens (i.e. solved problem), and the discovery of signs a miracle has occurred (De Jong & Berg, 2008). In my miracle question (15:45-16:43) I defined the miracle as life being perfect and did not take into account many of the recommended guidelines mentioned above. The client responded with confusion. Rather than addressing it or amplifying the miracle with further miracle amplifying questions, I returned questioning the client about their problems (16:43- 22:03). This part attempted to utilise a classic SFT intervention however delivered it poorly and failed to follow up appropriately.
Speculations influence a few suppositions with a specific end goal to give a clarification of a given circumstance. A few creators, for example, James and Gilliland (2013) clarifies that the Eclectic Crisis Intervention Theory involves a purposeful and deliberate specifically coordinated substantial ideas and methodologies to help the casualties from various methodologies. This specific hypothesis starts filling in as an errand situated hypothesis, rather than utilizing ideas. A few noteworthy assignments distinguished in this hypothesis are: Recognize components in all frameworks and to coordinate them into an inside reliable entire giving a more exact behavioral information to be clarified. Think about every existent hypothesis, techniques, and norms for assessing and controlling clinical information as per the propelled learning of time and place. The need to relate to no particular hypothesis, with a receptive outlook and persistently explore different avenues regarding those plans and systems that deliver victories. This specific hypothesis incorporates two unavoidable topics. The first of those topic is that individuals and all emergencies are one of a kind and unmistakable, hence can apply to anybody and any sort of culture. Furthermore, all individuals and all emergencies are comparable. Consequently, James and Gilliland (2013) comprehends that these suppositions are viewed as fundamentally unrelated. The mixed approach, as per James and Gilliland (2013) give a chance to various methodologies and speculations, along these lines, it enables the chance of having the capacity to survey the casualty's needs with a specific end goal to apply and design the proper strategies customized to the individual. The advisor, then again, will go out on a limb and will have the eagerness to change a way to deal with another method regardless of whether the first had work. Be that as it may, the Interpersonal hypothesis fundamentally clarifies that individuals can not manage an individual condition of an emergency for long, in the event that they truly trust in themselves and in others. Having certainty, the individual will end up self-completed and defeat the emergency (James and Gilliland, 2013). Crandall, Parnell and Spillan (2014) clarified that the principal objective of the emergency administration group, CMT is to prepare for potential emergencies and deal with those emergencies that in the long run happen. In this manner, it will be viewed in three perspectives, emergency reaction associations and survey their connection between associations. Moral and legitimate difficulties. Crandall, Parnell and Spillan (2014) gave a comprehension of the significance of moral and legitimate duties and difficulties when managing associations and their social obstructions. The moral culture of the associations the greater part of time is being imperfect in light of the exploitative conduct performed by its representatives, and paying little heed to their composed code of morals. For instance, improbable objectives of associations, may lead workers to farfetched basic leadership. In this manner, representatives may feel, that they ought to cause in unscrupulous conduct to get the objective by undermining hierarchical strategies (Crandall, Parnell and Spillan, 2014). Then again, moral gauges are not considered to have legitimate weight just, as indicated by James and Gilliland (2013); despite the fact that these benchmarks issues are centered more around directing codes of behaviors to the calling. Infringement of these codes can and will lead any expert to be rebuke or may lose their permit commanded by the calling's morals board. As per Reyes and Jacobs (2006) clarified that the procedure facilitates and conquer multicultural hindrances and difficulties, for example, dialect, convictions, coordinations, and manageability. Moreover, it might decrease allegations of social heartlessness. A case of this might be think about when as an association does not faith in noteworthy religious occasions, and their representatives must present themselves to work, against their convictions and the association. Associations must create standard moral direct rules, which must execute morals trainings with a specific end goal to feature moral issues and how they may respond to the emergency (Crandall, Parnell and Spillan, 2014). Moral standards may have an immense and shifted recognition, associations and also specialists on call must be put aside their convictions keeping in mind the end goal to reach and help the emergency. Along these lines, empowering adapting practices reliable to the individual's convictions, and traditions enable morals minorities to comprehend the administration and mending process (Reyes and Jacobs, 2006). All through the procedure of emergency administration and the specialists on call, winds up basic to fathom what their part is in this procedure with a specific end goal to give the suitable social help to the association and its faculty in require. By and by, as per Crandall, Parnell and Spillan (2014) there are a few proposals or rules that may better moral culture codes that can enhance radically the guide execution when there are multicultural difficulties or hindrances when overseeing and reacting to emergencies. One of these recommendations may stay away from, when a dishonest conduct is found. For this situation, the association must react instantly to remedy the circumstance and teach the individual in charge of the conduct bring about against the moral rules codes. Another proposal to conquer practices that disregard moral, lawful and multicultural difficulties or boundaries, is contracting a boss, officer or chief of morals. This individual obligations as an officer, boss or executive which would serve in top administration or governing body, who likewise will answer to the most extreme level of the association whether this is an open or private one. This position will advance the moral gauges of the association and also its way of life; guaranteeing the representatives conduct along tending to their worries and needs. In a comparable circumstance, Crandall, Parnell and Spillan (2014) recommended that chiefs, executive or presidents should require to have practical objectives. These objectives are effectively thought out, something else, doubtful objectives supports dishonest choice and in this manner conduct among workers. Along this proposal, top administration or official executives, may give a hotline number and additionally email in which workers have a man or office inside their association that they can trust and to whom they can report deceptive practices or moral infringement keep up its privacy. This particular proposal may help representatives to report any kind of deceptive direct that they or another worker might confront. At long last, moral issues emerged inside associations on account of powerless moral standards or non-existent codes. The scene study of associations and ventures must distinguish and reveal moral shortcomings which are weakness focuses inside the framework. Therefore, the associations and ventures need to elevate thoughts inside to construct an enhanced moral environment. At last, the associations and businesses in their learning stages may advance enhancing the moral execution all through the encounters of particular emergency occasions. Depiction of a model to prepare advocates for an emergency. >GET ANSWER