Write a critical appraisal of a nursing health assessment (relevant to your stream: paediatric).
After viewing the video provided on the blackboard site assessment page, write a critical appraisal ncluding:
1. ?A review of the performance against a recognised health assessment framework
2. ?Analyse the strengths and limitations of the clinical assessment identified in the video
3. ?Ensure that you use professional academic writing (not in first person)
4. ?Justify your appraisal with references to literature and evidence using QUT APA style.
5. Critique: strengths/ limitations
(40%) 550 words
• Examined the strengths and limitations of the assessment explaining the patient’s experience and any professional development requirements for the nurse
• Exemplary use of theoretical principles as they were applied in the assessment
6. Knowledge of principles of health assessment
(40%) 550 words
• Analysed the assessment succinctly and extensively from the patient and nurse perspective
• Analysed and justified the assessment approach explaining how tailoring addressed individual patient’s needs
FamCA Coversheet and Orders Page 2 Direction FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Williams Specialist FOR THE APPLICANT: Hirst and Co Family Lawyers Insight FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr Galloway Specialist FOR THE RESPONDENT: Michael Conley Lawyers Requests UPON THE UNDERTAKING given by the spouse to the Court not to offer, arrange of, or additionally hamper his enthusiasm for the genuine property arranged at C Street, Suburb D in the State of New South Wales until additionally arrange IT IS ORDERED (1) That the spouse's Application in a Case documented 9 November 2017 is expelled. (2) That the use of the spouse contained in passage 2 of her Response to an Application in a Case documented 13 December 2017 is expelled. (3) That the spouse should pay the wife's expenses brought about in restricting his Application in a Case documented 9 November 2017 to be concurred or evaluated in understanding with the Family Law Rules 2004 on a gathering and gathering premise. Note: The type of the request is liable to the passage of the request in the Court's records. IT IS NOTED that distribution of this judgment by this Court under the nom de plume Zagoreos and Zagoreos has been endorsed by the Chief Justice according to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). Note: This duplicate of the Court's Reasons for Judgment might be liable to audit to cure minor typographical or syntactic blunders (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Guidelines 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variety to the request according to r 17.02 Family Law Standards 2004 (Cth). ?????????????? ????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????? FamCA Reasons Page 1 FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE Document NUMBER: SYC 1519 of 2017 Mr Zagoreos Candidate Also, Ms Zagoreos Respondent Explanations behind JUDGMENT 1. Property change procedures were started in the Sydney Registry of this Court by the spouse in March of this current year. On the use of the spouse, on 7 July 2017, Stevenson J requested the procedures exchanged to this registry. Presently, by Application in a Case documented on 9 November 2017, the spouse tries to have the issue set down for a discrete hearing on the issue of whether it is "just and impartial" to influence a property acclimation to arrange according to s 79(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The spouse contradicts the application. 2. Advice for the spouse effectively brings up that Rule 10.13 of the Family Law Standards 2004 grants a gathering to apply for a "choice on any issue", if the choice may: (a) discard all or part of the case; (b) make a trial superfluous; (c) make a trial considerably shorter; or (d) spare considerable expenses. 3. In deciding any such application, Rule 10.14 gives the Court the attentiveness to: (an) expel any piece of the case; (b) choose an issue; (c) make a last request on any issue; ?????????????? ????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????? FamCA Reasons Page 2 (d) arrange a catching wind of an issue or actuality; or (e) with the assent of the gatherings, arrange intervention about the case or some portion of the case. 4. The Court's energy isn't, in any case, constrained to the alternatives set out in Rule 10.14. (See Rule 1.10) The Submissions for the Husband 5. To put it plainly, the spouse's central conflict is that it isn't simply and fair for a property alteration request to be put forth in this defense. In making that accommodation, he alludes to the High Court's choice in Stanford v Stanford (2012) 293 ALR 70 and presents that the High Court held that the "initial phase" in the way toward deciding applications for orders according to s 79 of the Family Law Act is an appraisal of "the current lawful and fair interests of the gatherings in their property" and that the "second step" includes "discovering whether it is simply and impartial to make a request adjusting the interests of the gatherings in their property". Successfully, he presents that the said "second step" of the procedure can and ought to be managed by the Court in this case by methods for the holding of a discrete hearing on that issue. 6. For the spouse it is submitted at that point, with reference to Rule 10.13, that the advantage for the Court and the gatherings, in the event that he is fruitful with the conflict that it isn't simply and impartial for a property alteration request to be made, lies in the procedures being in this manner discarded totally, there being no requirement for any further trial. 7. The Court was informed that the assurance of that issue as a discrete issue would just require two days of Court time instead of five days of Court time for the becoming aware of "the total of the spouse's claim". It was said that would bring about costs reserve funds for the gatherings and the Court, and a probability that the Court could oblige such a hearing significantly prior. 8. Fundamentally, the proof of the spouse and the entries made on his sake were introduced on a presumption that if a discrete hearing with respect to whether there is any principled explanation behind meddling with the current lawful and impartial enthusiasm of the gatherings is held, there will be no requirement for valuations of the spouse's broad property interests to be given to the wife and showed into prove. Some foundation 9. The spouse is 52 years old and the wife is 45 years old. ?????????????? ????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????? FamCA Reasons Page 3 10. They differ with respect to when they began living respectively. The spouse states it was in 2006. The spouse declares it was in 2008. They wedded in 2009. They isolated in April 2016. In spite of the fact that they needed to have youngsters and over and over attempted to do as such with therapeutic help, they didn't have any. 11. When they met, the spouse worked in an expert limit and the husband was a specialist. The spouse had broad property interests, yet the wife had little in the method for resources. 12. The spouse said in confirm that he and the wife had "dialogs" at "around the time [they] initiated [their] relationship". The spouse was in the middle of settling a division of property with his previous spouse at the time and he said the spouse for this situation said to him: I would not ever need to have those sorts of issues with you. I think we ought to concur on how we will lead our money related courses of action. I comprehend that individuals can go into a pre-marital understanding which shields their benefits from assert. In the event that you need me to sign a pre-nup, I'll sign anything you need. 13. The spouse said that he reacted with words to the impact of: Great. That is extraordinary. You should, simply do whatever you need with your cash and I'll do whatever I need with mine and we'll abandon it at that. Section 1: There are a couple of various ways you could approach the written work of this article: The topical approach: Choose a topic or thought that you find in the play and afterward make a statement about how and additionally why that topic is being utilized. Consider the subjects talked about in Unit 2: Love Alienation/Otherness The American Dream/Nightmare The Quest for Identity/Coming of Age Conformity/Rebellion Perform a character ponder. Talk about what spurs this character to do what he or she does or maybe examine how and why the character manages the contentions inside the play. You could likewise think about and differentiate two characters. Look into the play—or some component of the play—with another artistic work. If you don't mind contact your educator in the event that you are wanting to utilize a scholarly work for examination that has not been canvassed in this class. Notwithstanding or set up of the methodologies portrayed above, you should need to utilize a formalist's way to deal with investigate and translate the artistic work you have picked. You should seriously think about the accompanying inquiries and contemplations: How do conundrum, incongruity, vagueness, and strain work in the play? Is there a focal or central entry that can be said to whole up the aggregate of the work? What are the key images in the play? Section 2: Once you settle on an approach and a theme: If you have any inquiries or need direction, examine your decisions with your educator. Ensure you have a solid proposition proclamation. This ought not be an inquiry or something "self-evident" and undebatable like an outline of what occurs in the play. Rather, it ought to be your own particular crisp thought that takes a firm position on your picked part of the play. Put forward to demonstrate your attestation about the content. To do as such, you have to: Analyze your essential source (Death of a Salesman) and discover citations that help your statement. Discover optional sources (academic articles) to move down your statement. (Incorporate these sources in your working book reference.) This is your academic investigate. By discovering researchers to help your thoughts or considerably counter them, you are going down your own considerations utilizing proof from specialists in the field. Take after MLA Format: Use MLA organize for the paper: Purdue Owl: MLA information Length: least of 1000 - 1500 words Include a Works Cited Page, not to be tallied in the 1000-1500 word least Appropriate Scholarly Secondary Sources Included: least of 3 insightful sources. You are required to use at slightest one direct statement or summarize in the body of your exposition from every one of your three required auxiliary sources with a specific end goal to meet the base prerequisites of this exploration article. Make sure to have a suitable title for your paper (See Titling Your Essay) Write with a logical reason: Do not spend excessively space abridging the content. Expect that your peruser has just perused or seen the play. Go for a sorted out paper that offers your peruser some new knowledge into the play. In outline: You make a statement. You demonstrate it with printed illustrations. You back it up with other insightful help from your examination. Arranging and Style Be certain to keep up a fitting scholastic tone (no slang, second-individual, compressions, and so on.) Your exposition ought to be written, twofold separated, in 12-point Times New Roman textual style, with one-inch edges, and numbered pages. Incorporate your name, my name, the title of the class, also, the date in the upper left-hand corner of the main page. Focus your title (you don't have to underline or emphasize it) and place it over the body of the exposition. Try not to incorporate a cover sheet. Driving and Managing in Human Service Organizations 4 min recording planning of social work center subject (Leading and Managing in Human Service Organizations) In light of the appended document (contextual investigation), get ready for the 4 min transcript of pretend chronicle (social specialist) and that cop. The arrangement process is to make the concurrence with that police however much as could be expected. You don't have to center around the tending to assignment totally in this 4min pretend. The critical is on the procedure to make the understanding however much as could be expected and how to matin a positive relationship amid belligerence. Be that as it may, before when u set up this, Plz login my record and need you ace this subject totally. In any case it will come up short and leave the attention on the pretend. Moreover, U additionally need to set up the response of that cop. The initial three week powerpoint is essential when you set up this transcript of recoding, especially on week 3. Its improbable to dismiss and too I connected a criticism petition for you that you can know how to achieve the standard amid the 4min recording pretend. Rmb you have to uncover the transaction abilities and coordinate hypothesis and practice to my pretend. Moreover, I appended the course plot that satisfy your commonality of this course can perform well on the pretend chronicle. https://lo.unisa.edu.au/course/view.php?id=13364My account Name: LEUTY012 Pw: HKboy111 E-perusing to ace the course which is expected to peruse. https://lo.unisa.edu.au/squares/course_essentials/ereadingslaunchpage.php?id=13364&student=1 At the point when the recoding begin, you envision you completed that gathering about DV and discover the cop. You dont need to present yourself. Amid the arrangement process, what does the Social specialist/cop need. what is the shared opinion. What is SW/PO batna, wellspring of energy. You have to precisely break down before you begin that transaction.>GET ANSWER