Is there justice outside of the laws?
Here are the instructions for establishing a plan:

Formulate a hypothesis based on the spontaneous response. This will be the subject of the first part.
Find at least two arguments in favor of the first hypothesis. They will form the two sub-parts of the game. (An argument coming from an author, an argument coming from your knowledge.)
Make a transition. It often begins with But, However… and it serves to show that the part which precedes it is not enough. She objects to the previous part.
Formulate a hypothesis based on the opposing response. This will be the subject of the second part.
Find at least two arguments in favor of the second hypothesis. They will form the two sub-parts of the game. (An argument coming from an author, an argument coming from your knowledge.)
Make a transition. It often begins with But, However… and it serves to show that the part which precedes it is not enough. She objects to the previous part.
Formulate a hypothesis that answers the topic by overcoming the two previous parts. This will be the subject of the third part.
Find at least two arguments in favor of the first hypothesis. They will form the two sub-parts of the game. (An argument coming from an author, an argument coming from your knowledge.)

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Is There Justice Outside of the Laws?

Introduction

Topic: Is justice solely contained within the boundaries of legal systems or does it exist beyond them?

Problematic Example: Consider a scenario where a disadvantaged individual faces harsher judgment and sentencing compared to someone from a privileged background, highlighting the potential discrepancies in justice based on societal status.

Key Terms Analysis:

Justice: The concept of fairness and moral rightness in decisions and actions.
Laws: Legal regulations and systems established by societies to maintain order and administer justice.

Problem Formulation: The paradox lies in whether justice is truly served within legal frameworks that may be influenced by societal inequalities and biases.

Plan: This essay will explore the concept of justice both within and outside legal systems by examining perspectives from Michel Foucault, Cicero, and Thomas Hobbes.

Development

Part 1: Justice Within Legal Systems

Hypothesis: Legal systems are designed to uphold justice for all members of society.
Arguments:

Michel Foucault’s observation on how societal structures can lead to inequality in judicial processes.
Data showing disparities in incarceration rates based on social classes in France.

Part 2: Justice Beyond Legal Systems

Hypothesis: Natural sense of justice can be distorted by laws that are not inherently just.
Arguments:

Cicero’s belief that laws do not always align with natural feelings of justice.
The example of the Code Noir, illustrating how legal frameworks can perpetrate injustice.

Part 3: The Concept of Just Laws

Hypothesis: Laws are perceived as just when they are collectively agreed upon by a society.
Arguments:

Thomas Hobbes’ comparison of state laws to rules in a game, emphasizing the role of collective agreement.
The idea that laws emanate from societal consensus rather than imposed authority.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the question of whether justice exists outside of legal systems is complex and multifaceted. While laws aim to establish order and fairness, societal inequalities and subjective interpretations can sometimes hinder true justice. By considering insights from Foucault, Cicero, and Hobbes, we recognize that justice is not solely confined within laws but also guided by innate moral compasses and societal agreements. Ultimately, the pursuit of justice demands continuous reflection and refinement of legal systems to ensure equitable treatment for all individuals, regardless of their social standing.

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer