Educators should understand the learning and behavioral characteristics of students with moderate to severe disabilities

by | Jun 11, 2025 | EDUCATION

 

Educators should understand the learning and behavioral characteristics of students with moderate to severe disabilities when providing direct services and supports within the school setting. In turn, teachers can use such knowledge to collaborate with general educators and other professional colleagues when planning meaningful learning activities and social interactions with peers and adults. Expected student progress is made more viable when the selection, development, and adaptation of learning experiences for individuals with moderate to severe disabilities consider individual abilities and other related factors.

 

Create a matrix to compare and contrast the typical and atypical cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development of K-8 students without disabilities, with dyslexia, with mild disabilities, and those with moderate to severe disabilities. Include 3-5 characteristics per student disability type and developmental criteria.

 

Additionally, write a 250-500 word summary in which you:

 

Explain how understanding typical and atypical development of K-8 students can be used by all educators to respond to the learning and behavioral needs of students with moderate to severe disabilities.

Explain how collaboration between special educators, general educators, and related service providers regarding learning and behavioral characteristics of students can help create safe, inclusive, culturally responsive learning environments that engage students with disabilities in meaningful learning activities and social interactions.

Support your matrix and summary with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Educators recognize that every student brings unique strengths and needs to the classroom. For students with moderate to severe disabilities, understanding their specific learning and behavioral characteristics is paramount to providing effective direct services and supports. This knowledge not only informs individualized instruction but also empowers teachers to collaborate effectively with general educators and other professionals, ensuring that all learning activities and social interactions are meaningful and conducive to progress. By considering individual abilities and related factors, educators can select, develop, and adapt experiences that truly foster growth for these students.

Here is a matrix comparing typical and atypical cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development in K-8 students across different profiles:

Comparative Matrix: Cognitive, Linguistic, and Social-Emotional Development in K-8 Students

Educators recognize that every student brings unique strengths and needs to the classroom. For students with moderate to severe disabilities, understanding their specific learning and behavioral characteristics is paramount to providing effective direct services and supports. This knowledge not only informs individualized instruction but also empowers teachers to collaborate effectively with general educators and other professionals, ensuring that all learning activities and social interactions are meaningful and conducive to progress. By considering individual abilities and related factors, educators can select, develop, and adapt experiences that truly foster growth for these students.

Here is a matrix comparing typical and atypical cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional development in K-8 students across different profiles:

Comparative Matrix: Cognitive, Linguistic, and Social-Emotional Development in K-8 Students

Developmental Area Students Without Disabilities (Typical) Students with Dyslexia (Atypical) Students with Mild Disabilities (Atypical) Students with Moderate to Severe Disabilities (Atypical)
Cognitive – Develops abstract thinking, problem-solving, and critical thinking skills. <br> – Acquires academic skills (reading, writing, math) at age-appropriate levels. <br> – Processes information efficiently; strong working memory. <br> – Exhibits age-appropriate attention span and executive functions. – Difficulty with phonological awareness (e.g., rhyming, sound manipulation). <br> – Challenges with rapid naming and decoding words. <br> – Often strong reasoning and comprehension when information is presented orally. <br> – May struggle with sequential tasks and rote memorization. – Slower pace of learning across academic areas. <br> – Difficulties with abstract concepts and generalization of skills. <br> – Challenges with working memory and information processing speed. <br> – May require explicit instruction and repeated practice to master skills. – Significant delays in cognitive milestones (e.g., cause-effect, object permanence). <br> – Limited capacity for abstract thought; concrete learning preferred. <br> – Challenges with generalization of learned skills to new contexts. <br> – Requires significant support for problem-solving and decision-making.
Linguistic – Develops rich vocabulary and complex sentence structures. <br> – Understands and uses figurative language, humor. <br> – Follows multi-step directions. <br> – Engages in reciprocal conversations. – Persistent difficulties with accurate and fluent word recognition. <br> – Poor spelling and written expression. <br> – Challenges with reading comprehension due to decoding struggles. <br> – Oral language skills may be strong, masking reading difficulties. – Limited vocabulary and simpler sentence structures. <br> – Difficulties understanding complex language or abstract instructions. <br> – Challenges with expressing thoughts clearly and organizing ideas. <br> – May struggle with receptive and expressive language delays. – Significant delays in acquiring spoken language; some may be non-verbal. <br> – May use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. <br> – Limited vocabulary and short, simple phrases or single words. <br> – Challenges with understanding complex or multi-step commands.
Social-Emotional – Develops empathy and perspective-taking. <br> – Forms reciprocal friendships and navigates social hierarchies. <br> – Regulates emotions and uses coping strategies. <br> – Understands social cues and norms. – May experience frustration, anxiety, and low self-esteem due to academic struggles. <br> – Can withdraw from reading-related activities. <br> – May develop compensatory social strategies. <br> – Risk of feeling “dumb” despite average to above-average intelligence. – May struggle with social interactions and peer relationships. <br> – Can exhibit difficulties with emotional regulation and impulse control. <br> – May have lower self-esteem due to academic and social challenges. <br> – Can benefit from explicit social skills instruction. – Limited understanding of complex social cues and abstract emotions. <br> – May require explicit instruction for social skills and peer interactions. <br> – Can exhibit behaviors that challenge (e.g., self-stimulatory, aggression) due to communication difficulties or sensory needs. <br> – May rely heavily on adult prompting for social engagement.

Summary: Responding to Diverse Learning Needs in Inclusive Environments

Understanding the typical and atypical development of K-8 students is an indispensable tool for all educators when responding to the learning and behavioral needs of students with moderate to severe disabilities. By comparing the developmental trajectories, educators gain insight into the specific areas where students with significant disabilities may require additional support and specialized instruction. For instance, knowing that typical cognitive development progresses towards abstract thinking highlights the need for concrete, hands-on learning experiences and visual supports for students with moderate to severe disabilities, who often learn best with direct manipulation and real-world examples. Similarly, recognizing typical linguistic milestones, such as reciprocal conversations and complex sentence structures, underscores the importance of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems and highly structured communication opportunities for students whose verbal language development is significantly delayed. This comparative understanding allows educators to set individualized, yet ambitious, goals that are rooted in developmental realities while still striving for optimal progress.

Furthermore, this knowledge forms the bedrock for effective collaboration between special educators, general educators, and related service providers (such as speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, and behavior specialists). When all team members understand the unique cognitive, linguistic, and social-emotional characteristics of students with moderate to severe disabilities, they can collectively create safe, inclusive, and culturally responsive learning environments. General educators, supported by special educators, can adapt classroom materials and activities to accommodate diverse learning styles and paces, ensuring meaningful participation. For example, a general education teacher might use a visual schedule (a common support for students with moderate to severe disabilities) for the entire class during transitions, benefiting all students while specifically supporting those who rely on visual cues. Related service providers can integrate their therapeutic goals into academic and social contexts, rather than isolating skills. This collaborative approach fosters a sense of belonging and ensures that the curriculum and social interactions are not only accessible but also genuinely engaging, promoting positive peer relationships and functional skill acquisition in a holistic manner. By aligning their efforts around a shared understanding of student characteristics, educators can intentionally design environments where every student, regardless of disability, feels valued, safe, and empowered to learn and interact meaningfully within their community.

Scholarly Resources:

  1. Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A. A., & Wakeman, S. Y. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching literacy to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 269-291.
  2. Friend, M. (2018). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals (5th ed.). Pearson.
  3. National Research Council. (2002). Learning and understanding: Improving advanced study of mathematics and science in U.S. high schools. National Academies Press. (While focused on high schools, its foundational insights on cognitive development and learning principles are broadly applicable).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer