Answer the question
words, (based on chapters 25), explain (1) what is the position of Wilson and Kelling, (2) where did the theory of Broken Windows come from, (3) how did Wilson and Kelling support the theory.
, please state the position of Samuel Walker in Chapter 26.  He attempts to dispute several major tenets put forth by Wilson and Kelling.  What are they?
Compare and Contrast the two approaches of policing (community in chapter 27 and problem oriented in chapter 28).  Which do you think is more effective for crime control?



Title: An Analysis of Policing Strategies: From Broken Windows Theory to Community and Problem-Oriented Policing

Thesis Statement: The evolution of policing strategies from the Broken Windows theory proposed by Wilson and Kelling to the community policing approach in Chapter 27 and problem-oriented policing in Chapter 28 reflects a shift towards more proactive and community-centered crime control methods. While Wilson and Kelling focused on the importance of social disorder in crime prevention, Samuel Walker in Chapter 26 disputes some of the key tenets put forth by them, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency in policing.

Position of Wilson and Kelling:
In their seminal work on the Broken Windows theory, James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling argue that visible signs of disorder and neglect in communities, such as broken windows, can lead to an increase in crime rates. They suggest that addressing minor infractions and maintaining order in neighborhoods can prevent more serious criminal activities from occurring.

Origins of Broken Windows Theory:
The theory of Broken Windows originated from an article published by Wilson and Kelling in The Atlantic Monthly in 1982. It gained widespread attention and influenced law enforcement policies across the United States, promoting a focus on quality-of-life issues to prevent crime.

Support for Broken Windows Theory:
Wilson and Kelling supported the Broken Windows theory by conducting studies that showed a correlation between disorderly environments and crime rates. They argued that by addressing small issues like graffiti, loitering, and vandalism, law enforcement could create an atmosphere of order that deters criminal behavior.

Position of Samuel Walker:
In Chapter 26, Samuel Walker challenges several key principles of Wilson and Kelling’s Broken Windows theory. He disputes the notion that aggressive policing tactics, such as “zero-tolerance” policies, are effective in reducing crime. Walker emphasizes the importance of police accountability, transparency, and adherence to constitutional rights in maintaining public trust and legitimacy.

Comparison of Community Policing and Problem-Oriented Policing:
Community policing, as discussed in Chapter 27, focuses on building positive relationships between law enforcement agencies and the communities they serve. It emphasizes collaboration, problem-solving, and prevention strategies to address the root causes of crime. On the other hand, problem-oriented policing, as described in Chapter 28, involves analyzing specific crime issues and developing targeted solutions to address them effectively.

Effectiveness for Crime Control:
While both community policing and problem-oriented policing have their merits, community policing appears to be more effective for crime control in the long term. By fostering trust and cooperation between police officers and community members, community policing can lead to sustainable reductions in crime rates and improved quality of life for residents. Problem-oriented policing, while valuable for addressing specific crime problems, may lack the community engagement necessary for comprehensive crime prevention efforts.

In conclusion, the evolution of policing strategies from the Broken Windows theory to community and problem-oriented policing reflects a shift towards a more holistic and community-centered approach to crime control. While different approaches have their strengths, prioritizing community involvement and cooperation may ultimately lead to more effective and sustainable results in reducing crime rates and improving public safety.



This question has been answered.

Get Answer