In addition to your introduction and conclusion, your presentation should include two key parts. First, introduce your broadcaster, its history, its current mandate, its funding model, its programming, etc. Then, conduct an “audit” of how well your broadcaster fulfils its public service role.
GuidelinesYour presentation should include the following sections:Introduction: Context, overview of your key questions/conclusions, outlineBody:Presentation of your foreign public broadcaster: history, mandate, funding model, overview of its programming, number of employees, platforms and services (radio, web, TV), etc. If an important element of information isn’t readily available, say so in your presentation instead of letting us believe that you did not research it.
Audit of your foreign public broadcaster: your analytical grid/framework, methodology, main conclusions, etc. Your audit should be thorough. Don’t simply name drop concepts. Explain your methodology and give us concrete examples.
Conclusion: Summary of your key points, final thoughts
References: Mention sources during your presentation and include one or two slides at the end with a properly formatted (APA) list of the references you used.
When relevant, include very short examples of your foreign public broadcaster’s programming (audio clips, video excerpts, screen captures, etc.). But remember that these excerpts should complement your presentation, not make up for a lack of content.
Only need Audit of your foreign public broadcaster part
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Audit of Foreign Public Broadcaster
Analytical Grid/Framework
In auditing the foreign public broadcaster, the framework utilized comprises three main pillars: mission fulfillment, audience service, and financial sustainability. These pillars are crucial in assessing the broadcaster’s effectiveness in fulfilling its public service role.
Methodology
Mission Fulfillment: Evaluation of how well the broadcaster adheres to its stated mission and values. This involves analyzing the alignment between programming content and public service objectives.
Audience Service: Examination of the broadcaster’s engagement with diverse audiences, inclusivity in content production, and responsiveness to audience feedback.
Financial Sustainability: Assessment of the broadcaster’s funding model, budget allocation, and long-term financial viability to ensure continued provision of public service content.
Main Conclusions
Mission Fulfillment: The broadcaster demonstrates a strong commitment to its public service mandate by offering a diverse range of educational, informative, and culturally enriching programs. However, there is room for improvement in addressing certain societal issues more comprehensively.
Audience Service: The broadcaster excels in engaging with various demographic groups and providing content that reflects the cultural diversity of its audience. Nevertheless, there is a need to enhance interactive platforms for increased audience participation.
Financial Sustainability: The broadcaster’s funding model appears to be stable, with a mix of government subsidies and commercial revenue. Efforts should be made to diversify revenue streams to mitigate potential budgetary constraints in the future.
Conclusion
The audit reveals that the foreign public broadcaster has made significant strides in fulfilling its public service role through a commitment to diverse programming, audience engagement, and financial stability. By addressing the identified areas for improvement, the broadcaster can further enhance its impact and relevance in serving the public interest.
References:
Author A. (Year). Title of Article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages.
Author B. (Year). Title of Book. Publisher.
Author C. (Year). Title of Report. Organization Name.
