While blockchain is successful with cryptocurrencies, it is also beneficial for information governance in businesses. After reading this article (https://www.everteam.com/en/role-of-blockchain-in-information-governance/), discuss at least two ways you foresee blockchain transforming information governance in businesses. Be sure to utilize sources and provide at least one detailed example of your findings.
A substantive post will do at least two of the following:
Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
Provide extensive additional information on the topic
Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
Share an applicable personal experience
K’s central disagreement was based on its economy not being able to control the number of immigrants it was receiving due to its position within the stagnating EU. However, could this decision help the economy? Decreasing immigration would reduce the GDP of Britain. Less migrants from European countries would mean a decline in spending, that’s 5% (3.2m) of European migrants that pay government taxes towards the NHS and other public sectors. Controlling immigration would result in the limitation in the supply of skilled labour for UK’s health force thus increasing costs for the economy as they spend more on education. This is because the percentage of people coming from Europe are highly likely to be educated at 44% and are more likely to get into work, compared to 23% of British born (Dunford and Kirk, 2016), from the argument its shows Brexit is slowing the economy down. Although, is the quantity of migrants from Europe enough to halt the growth in our economy? The UK closing its borders to EU nationals would not affect the immigrants coming from other countries, for example India and China, therefore it would not affect the GDP by far. To support this, BBC news reports the increase in growth in our economy: ‘Latest figures show that the economy grew by 0.5% in the three months after the Brexit vote’ (BBC,2016) proving the effect was positive but less than expected at 0.7%. At this point in time figures may not show the full impact of Brexit on the economy as it is recent, however the ratio of people outside of the EU are still greater than the ones within the EU coming to the UK, making the point valid for argument. As the economy grows it attracts new bodies. This is because a growing economy offers great and better opportunities such as better jobs, more pay and better standards of living. How does this benefit the economy? The answer is clear, the monopoly effect. The graph shows the relationship between the number of migrants by citizenship compared to the on-going years. Furthermore, as it gets to 2015 it shows that non-EU and EU citizens have migrated to the UK at the same quantity causing Brexit to be less harmful to a variety of benefits migrants provide to the UK economy. Despite this this evidence may be uncertain as they are survey results and cannot be reliant, data shown may not actually show the real affect. Brexit will cause a reduction in immigration from other European countries, this will lead to a loss of benefits that Britain gain from these migrants. One prime example: Nurses in the UK would decrea>GET ANSWER