Duty to Report
Duty to Report child abuse is a separate exception to confidentiality. Teachers, counselors, social welfare and health professions are “mandated reporters” under the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. Please note that there are variations among states. New York, for example, appears stricter than Kansas. Recently, a woman came to the Emergency Department following an unusual altercation with her husband where she sustained head trauma. Although no children were harmed, there was no history of violence prior to this, and no criminal charges brought, the staff immediately involved the child welfare authorities due to the fact that a child was present during the incident. They made multiple visits to the household and mandated the husband to a “batterers” group.
we can see that the hospital authorities in New York State were highly vigilant about possible dangers to a child in a household where the husband had an incidence of violent behavior towards his wife. Now, in Kansas, this would be much less likely to happen, and it is not mandated to report danger to a child where a child was not hurt.
Write a thorough APA 1-2 page reflection essay addressing the following points:
What would you think would be proper course of action if you were a neighbor whom the child confided in? Support your answer through reference(s).
What do the confidentiality regulations of your state have to say about such a situation? Remember to reference your source(s) for this section.
You must provide no less than 2 scholarly references in your essay.
The dedication of subjective social work practice to the strengthening of the disappointed populace is estimable. Subjective social work specialists stress strengthening as their most predominant moral thought. However, strengthening is regularly a selective moral rule. The restrictiveness of the enabling examination pattern can be comprehended from two contemporary points of view: the nature of social work and the absence of a particular code of morals and preparing in morals for subjective social work analysts. Most social work isn't essential research. Rather, social work is a philosophy submitted discipline in which specialists and scientists have an obligation to advance equity and improve welfare. The idea of strengthening permits social work specialists, especially subjective scientists, to move in the direction of these objectives through their examination. Besides, by enabling exploration members and related populaces, social work specialists can connect a hole that may exist between their worth responsibilities as social laborers and an absence of preparing on look into morals. Along these lines, strengthening offers social work analysts the chance to be moral as per current standard suspecting in social work. The pattern to underscore strengthening in subjective social work ponders uncovers benefits and a few impediments, as analysts frequently stress effective or strong people inside abused gatherings examined. The double spotlight on versatility and strengthening adds to inquire about members as good examples of fruitful adapting inside their networks. At the same time, it eclipses the accounts of the large numbers of common heartbreaking individuals from these mistreated or disappointed populaces. The objective of most strengthening examinations is to build the social intensity of populaces and not simply the exploration members, versatile or not (Peled and Leichtentritt, 2002). Various focal points have been reported about the utilization of subjective techniques for social work. For instance, illustrative, inductive, and unpretentious methods for information assortment are viewed as good with the information and estimations of the social work calling. In conditions where social specialists are looked with issues and issues that are not amiable to quantitative assessment, subjective techniques have been supported. The social'psychological bases of subjective research recommend that it is perfect with the individual in-condition worldview of social work practice. Subjective methodologies are comparable in strategy to clinical social work appraisals, as clinicians depend on meetings to accumulate information on a customer's issues with regards to the earth. The clinician audits a progression of hunches and working theories that depend on perceptions reached the customer. Subjective scientists, similar to clinicians, are prepared to examine each case exclusively, without forcing assumptions or endeavoring to sum up to all customers having a specific issue. Subjective scientists keep up field notes and archives on their exploration, similarly as clinicians keep in touch with a customer as procedure accounts or case records. In investigations of social procedures of complex human frameworks, for example, families, associations, and networks, subjective philosophy might be the most suitable research system. Researchers of the family currently laud the advantages of subjective strategies in picking up, or understanding, the dynamic procedures, implications, correspondence examples, encounters, and individual and family developments of the real world. Field settings and social help offices give one of a kind chances to the subjective investigation of social procedures (McRoy, 2010). Subjective methodologies have the benefit of adaptability and, top to bottom investigation, just as the possibility to watch an assortment of highlights of a social circumstance. Subjective scientists directing up close and personal meetings can rapidly alter the meeting plan if the interviewee's reactions recommend the requirement for extra tests or lines of request in future meetings. In addition, subjective scientists can create and utilize inquiries on the spot which can help in a more inside and out comprehension of a respondent's convictions, frames of mind, or circumstance. Over the span of a meeting or perception, a specialist can note changes in real articulation, state of mind, voice pitch, and ecological elements that could impact the interviewee's reactions. This observational information can be particularly significant when a respondent's non-verbal communication contradicts verbal reactions given to inquiries questions. By and by, subjective procedure isn't totally exact on the grounds that individuals don't generally act sensibly or typically (McCoy, 2010). Subjective research is as often as possible dependent on the scientist's elucidations or decisions. Understandings are commonly exceptionally close to home and impacted by the scientist's very own qualities and individual inclinations. These reactions are viewed as subjectivity. In this way, subjective research discoveries can't be duplicated similarly as quantitative outcomes. For instance, two subjective analysts, one with a progressively skeptical perspective and one with an increasingly hopeful perspective, both considering a similar marvel and interviewin>GET ANSWER