General Instructions on Case Write-Ups
Your write-up should be 1 to 2 pages, single-spaced, at standard typeface (12 or 14 points).
It should briefly (in very few sentences) lay out the basic facts of the case. These are usually generally agreed
upon by the time it gets to the final appeal stage; i.e., the Supreme Court or a Federal District court.
What is much more important is the issue at law – the dispute about what the law means or how it should be
What was the majority of the court’s decision in the case, and – more importantly – what was the basic
the reasoning behind this decision?
If you are asked to read a dissent in the case, what was the decision and reasoning in the minority?
Do you agree or disagree with the court’s decision? Explain why.
To avoid even the appearance of plagiarism, references should be clearly connected to the text through
parentheses (Smith, 2016) or footnotes. It is not enough to put your references at the end of the paper, with no
way to see what text connects with each reference.
Direct quotes should be in quotation marks or, if more than one sentence, in an indented paragraph. Material
which is a close paraphrase of another work, although not a direct quote, should be referenced and explicitly
acknowledged with the expressions like ‘paraphrase,’ ‘in other words,’ ‘to put it another way,’ or something
Text: Chapter 3 Materiality
1) SEC v. Howey (U.S. 1946)
2) TSC Industries Inc. v. Northway, Inc. (U.S. 1976)
3) Basic v. Levinson (U.S. 1988)
SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin #99: Materiality
Intersection the extension End 1. Camera reality As expressed by Ozturk (2008: 21), film craftsmanship makes windows open to the world and present day individuals to take care of social issues. A film is a craftsmanship that can replicate realities by extending time and spot. Hence, films zeroing in on the city don't uncover the city itself, yet uncover its exhibition and understanding. Consequently, cameras can frame and contort metropolitan regions, pictures and encounters like inward mirrors or curved mirrors. A year back, I was crossing the Westminster connect in London. This scaffold is experiencing childhood in Diet, so it is a pipe for travelers. From the finish of the extension, around twelve individuals are playing 3 cards, or a cup containing balls. Of course, in the event that you wager a few times and get 50 pounds to recapture several pounds, you will lose it by dropping 20 pounds and you will shed another 20 pounds. We have seen it previously, yet I have never observed it on a mechanical scale. For travelers who are at risk to be hoodwinked, this resembles pulling the net. By and large, there are around 10 to 15 individuals who are working, and they should hunker down and watch more than 30 individuals from 20 to 30 individuals. So it is exceptionally evident what is happening, yet at the same time sightseers are projecting cash on the walkway. Intersection a scaffold might be a genuine motivation of a fit of anxiety. There is no analogy, an exacting extension here. It shouldn't be high or hazardous. Strolling the extension, you can fall into a white knuckle, slither, chest fixing, fit. It's screwing awful. Here and there you have to arrive at the opposite side of the extension. In any case, an extraordinary thing happened the previous evening. I am dreaming, I slipped on a solidified extension in obscurity. It is charming. OK, that is acceptable. I traveled straightforwardly. At that point, my deductive thinking turned around to me and I did it once more. There is no dread or frenzy, and it isn't sure that I will kick the bucket. It feels better. Fabulous, my fantasy is to stop by the bar over the scaffold and make a few circles on the move floor.>GET ANSWER