There has to be 4 parts to this paper….
1.An introduction: Here, state clearly what you will be doing your paper using “I-statements,” and formulating
your topic in terms of a main question or series of questions. This should be brief and no more than 1
paragraph long
2.Explanation and discussion: Here define the practice or issue you will be discussing. If it is relevant to the
way you will be addressing your topic, say something about the Canadian laws regarding this practice. Then
discuss at least two contrasting views on your topic, using textual evidence from the sources you have
researched to support your claims. This part should take up about 2/3 of the body of your paper.
3.Critical reflection: Present your own view on the practice or issue you are addressing, and create a sound
argument advocating your position. Make sure to support your argument with justifying premises (and, if
relevant, textual evidence). In defending your own view, it is a good idea not only to explain why you hold this
view, but to further explain why you disagree with opposing views. This part should take up about 1/3 of the
body of your paper.
4.Conclusion: Very briefly summarize (in 1 paragraph) what you have done in your paper and your final
conclusion(s) on the topic discussed, trying to present your ideas in a concise and powerful way that really
brings your point across to the reader.
You have to follow these instructions when writing the 4 paragraphs mentioned above:
1.you need to apply at least two of the ethical theories we have covered in class (Virtue ethics, Kantian
ethics/deontology, and utilitarianism) in your paper. You can apply more than two if you want, but in any case,
apply at least two. Egoism is not a valid choice for this paper. ( So basically say why it is unethical to eat meat
and relate it to at least two ethical theories mentioned above)
2.• Remember that you need to use at least 3 sources apart from the references in the course pack. You can
also use those sources, but you don’t have to. If you want to, you are also free to use more than 3 sources.
Make sure that one of your sources is a scholarly article or book, and another one of your sources is a news
article

Sample Solution

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer