The employees at your organization have formed a union

by | Mar 9, 2023 | Home Science

 

The employees at your organization have formed a union, and the bargaining process now begins. Write a case study in which you analyze the situation. First, begin with background information about the negotiation, and make certain to address the areas below.

Identify the state where the organization is located. Is the state a right-to-work state? If yes, explain what this means. If no, explain what this means. Why are the employees deciding to unionize? What are the mandatory bargaining subjects? Other than wages and hours, what are five other terms and conditions of employment? What are permissive bargaining subjects that will be negotiated? List at least five.
Second, you need to select members of your bargaining team. You will select four supervisors who were identified in the Unit VI Lesson. Discuss why you selected each supervisor, and compare/contrast their conflict management styles. Each supervisor must have a different conflict style. Explain how each supervisor can contribute to conflict resolution strategies used during negotiation.
Third, explain the two collective bargaining strategies, and identify which one you will recommend your team to use. Explain and support your rationale.
Finally, what will you propose happens if a labor management agreement is not reached by your team and the employee representatives?
Your case study must be a minimum of three pages in length, not counting the title and reference pages. Your case study should present an insightful and thorough analysis with strong arguments and evidence. You must use three academically reliable sources to support your analysis.Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, and make certain to include in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed.

 

Sample Solution

The organization in this case study is located in California, which is not a right-to-work state. This means that employees do not have the legal right to work without joining a union or payingunion dues and fees, as it is illegal for employers to fire or discriminate against workers who choose union representation. Employees are deciding to unionize for various reasons, such as gaining better wages and benefits, improved job security, more flexible working hours and better working conditions.

Sample Solution

The organization in this case study is located in California, which is not a right-to-work state. This means that employees do not have the legal right to work without joining a union or payingunion dues and fees, as it is illegal for employers to fire or discriminate against workers who choose union representation. Employees are deciding to unionize for various reasons, such as gaining better wages and benefits, improved job security, more flexible working hours and better working conditions.

Mandatory bargaining subjects include wages, hours of work and other benefits (such as vacation time). Other terms and conditions of employment that can be negotiated include health insurance coverage, retirement plans, grievance procedures and disciplinary procedures. Permissive bargaining subjects are items that the parties agree can be included in the contract but aren’t legally required; these include workplace safety policies/procedures, employee development programs etc.

For my bargaining team I have selected four supervisors: A supervisor with an accommodative conflict style – they believe it’s important to foster harmonious relationships within the group; A supervisor with an assertive conflict style – they prioritize their own needs while still considering those of others; A supervisor with a collaborative conflict style – they seek mutual benefit from all sides in order to reach agreement; And finally a supervisor with an avoidant conflict style – they try to minimize confrontation by avoiding establishing firm positions on controversial topics. Each supervisor has different strengths when it comes to negotiation strategies based on their respective styles: Accommodative types may be good at resolving conflicts through compromise; Assertive types may be good at pushing for desired outcomes through persuasive tactics; Collaborative types may excel at getting both sides engaged in meaningful dialogue about common goals ; Avoidant types may be good facilitators who help keep discussions focused on solutions rather than arguments over details. Together these supervisors can form a well-rounded team capable of addressing any possible issues during negotiation sessions so that both parties can come away satisfied with the outcome of their negotiations!

This question has been answered.

Get Answer