Compare and Contrast Black and Asians’ experiences of exclusion, racialization and inequality. Draw from the readings to make these comparisons historically, and in more recent time. (Example readings: Clerge, Wilkerson, Ong Hing, Bald, Loewen, Kim’s Bitter Fruit and her work on Affirmattive Action). Professor made it clear to “apply the author’s ideas and particularly your thoughts about their ideas to express your critical thinking skills (i.e., moving beyond summarizing and moving analyzing,
critiquing, and expanding the authors’ points). ” Feel free to do this with your own voice.
Please provide quotes when comparing and contrasting. Be sure to use the Chicago author-date citation style. I will add some of my own writing (or scribbling) as well. I only have info on Chinese, so I need to expand in other Asian groups (like Indo-trinidadians).
I want the title to be “Whites as the Law-Making Race: Comparative Inequalities of Black and Asian’s experiences”
“”Scribbles” are my notes, but do not feel constrained by the structure shown there: I was just trying to organize myself.
Further notes, take if it makes sense:

Stereotyping and prejudice:
On the third chapter of his The Mississippi Chinese, James W. Loewen (year?) positions
the reader in the American society of the 1930s and 1940s, eras that exposed United
States (US) residents to the social cauldron of racial imagination – which aided Whites to
advance toward the answer to the question: are Chinese worthy of White status? Loewen
tells of a time in which Chinese working immigrants sought to grow economically in the
globalized market of migrant work in the US. Loewen explains that the general consensus
between Chinese migrants is to attain enough income to be able to send remittances home
and ultimately reach enough economical comfort to move back. However, without
enough legal support to bring any other family members (particularly females; wives), or
any ability to travel back and forth to their homeland, the Chinese merchant or store
owner was to permute his status from a sojourner to a permanent immigrant (p. 70). The
Mississippi Chinese brings forward a state-wide example of the historical accounts of
Asian groups that migrated to America in lieu of a significantly better future in their
countries. Not being considered White, Chinese merchants in Mississippi and the rest of
the Delta and maintained an alien status. Tokenistic behaviors toward Chinese begin to
form, furthering their alienation. Loewen’s book shares some instances of this attittude
1
when quoting white members of a
“According to Paul Siu, the emigrant leaves to accomplish something – the job – and
intends to return home, but, “in due time, the sojourner becomes vague and uncertain
about the termination of his sojourn, because … he has already made some adjustments to
his new environment”
Economic inequality: Both Black and Asian communities experience economic
inequality, with disproportionate levels of poverty and unemployment compared to the
wider population. This is partly due to discrimination in the labor market, as well as other
structural factors such as lack of access to education and resources.
“The white man’s evaluation had to be taken seriously , because he controlled the
distribution of … valued commodities [like] public accommodations, legal treatment, and
public education”
Institutional racism: Both Black and Asian communities experience institutional racism,
where systems and institutions in society are structured in a way that disadvantages them.
For example, this can include biased hiring practices, unequal access to healthcare, and
discrimination in the criminal justice system.
Discrimination in education: Both Black and Asian communities experience
discrimination in education, with lower levels of access to quality education and higher
levels of exclusion and segregation in schools.
Page 65 of Mississippi Chinese talks ab 1930s education for black ppl
Overall, while Black and Asian communities have different experiences of exclusion and
marginalization, they share many similarities in terms of the forms of discrimination and
inequality they face.Stereotyping and prejudice:
On the third chapter of his The Mississippi Chinese, James W. Loewen (year?) positions
the reader in the American society of the 1930s and 1940s, eras that exposed United
States (US) residents to the social cauldron of racial imagination – which aided Whites to
advance toward the answer to the question: are Chinese worthy of White status? Loewen
tells of a time in which Chinese working immigrants sought to grow economically in the
globalized market of migrant work in the US. Loewen explains that the general consensus
between Chinese migrants is to attain enough income to be able to send remittances home
and ultimately reach enough economical comfort to move back. However, without
enough legal support to bring any other fami

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer