In preparation for a court appearance, the federal law enforcement agency wants to ensure proper forensic processes and techniques are used in a computer crime case involving identify theft.
When challenging the admissibility of the digital evidence, the defense examiner will evaluate the authentication and chain of custody techniques used. The federal law enforcement agency would like your company, AB Investigative Services (ABIS), to identify in a report the possible authentication and chain of custody techniques acceptable in the investigative process, including issues relating to First and Fourth Amendment privacy issues with respect to computer-related technologies.
Using the library, Internet, or any other credible materials, provide the following in your report to the federal law enforcement agency:
Begin the report with a one-page overview of the forensics process and the steps taken by an examiner related to identity theft and computer crime.
2 recommended examples of authentication acceptable in the investigative process of identity theft
2 recommended examples of chain of custody techniques of digital evidence
What is considered legal or illegal under the guidelines of the First and Fourth Amendments in relation to the identity theft investigation
Cite your sources using APA style.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

Title: Forensic Processes and Techniques in Identity Theft and Computer Crime Investigation

Introduction

Identity theft and computer crime cases require meticulous forensic processes and techniques to ensure the admissibility of digital evidence in court. This report aims to provide an overview of the forensic process and steps taken by an examiner in identity theft and computer crime investigations. Additionally, it will recommend examples of authentication and chain of custody techniques acceptable in the investigative process. Furthermore, it will discuss the legal considerations related to the First and Fourth Amendments in the context of identity theft investigations.

Forensic Process Overview

The forensic process in identity theft and computer crime investigations typically involves the following steps:

Identification: The investigator identifies potential digital evidence relevant to the case, such as computers, hard drives, or mobile devices.

Preservation: The investigator ensures the preservation of digital evidence by creating a forensic copy, often referred to as a “bitstream image,” to prevent any changes or modifications to the original evidence.

Analysis: The investigator performs a thorough analysis of the digital evidence using specialized forensic tools and techniques. This may involve recovering deleted files, examining internet browsing history, or analyzing communication records.

Interpretation: The investigator interprets the findings from the analysis phase, drawing conclusions and identifying key pieces of evidence relevant to the identity theft case.

Documentation: The investigator documents all steps taken, including the methods used, findings, and any relevant information necessary for presenting the evidence in court.

Recommended Examples of Authentication Techniques

Digital Signatures: Digital signatures utilize encryption algorithms to verify the authenticity and integrity of digital documents or files. By using a unique cryptographic key, the sender can sign a document digitally, providing a reliable method of authentication.

Biometric Authentication: Biometric authentication uses unique biological characteristics, such as fingerprints, retinal scans, or facial recognition, to verify an individual’s identity. This technique can be utilized to authenticate individuals involved in identity theft cases.

Recommended Examples of Chain of Custody Techniques

Documented Tracking: A crucial aspect of chain of custody is maintaining a detailed record of all individuals who handle the digital evidence. Each person who comes into contact with the evidence should document their actions and any changes made.

Secure Storage: Digital evidence must be stored securely to maintain its integrity and prevent unauthorized access or tampering. This may involve storing evidence in locked cabinets or using encrypted storage devices to protect against data breaches.

Legal Considerations of First and Fourth Amendments

Under the guidelines of the First Amendment, individuals have the right to freedom of speech and expression. However, this right does not protect illegal activities such as identity theft or other computer crimes. Investigating and prosecuting identity theft cases does not violate an individual’s First Amendment rights as long as it is conducted within lawful boundaries.

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement. However, courts have recognized that individuals have reduced expectations of privacy when it comes to electronic communications and digital devices. Law enforcement can obtain search warrants based on probable cause to search and seize digital evidence related to identity theft, provided they adhere to legal procedures.

Sources:

Casey, E. (2018). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime: Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet (4th ed.). Academic Press.
Taylor, R., Fritsch, E., & Liederbach, J. (2014). Digital Crime and Digital Terrorism (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
United States Courts. (n.d.). The Fourth Amendment. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov-f-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity/what-does4

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer