You must have watched the movie Trading Places or Saint of fort Washington to complete this term paper.
Answer both questions.
Please give multiple examples of one of the following ( Pick one)
a) Racial inequality
b)Of Poverty and wealth inequality
c)Of gender inequality
What would a conflict theorist say regarding the movie you just watched? what details/aspects of this story would they point to? and why in making their points.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Title: Wealth Inequality in the Movie “Trading Places”
Thesis Statement: The movie “Trading Places” highlights the pervasive issue of wealth inequality through various characters’ experiences, interactions, and societal structures, providing a compelling portrayal that aligns with the perspective of conflict theorists.
Introduction:
The movie “Trading Places” is a thought-provoking comedy that delves into the stark contrast between the lives of the wealthy elite and those living in poverty. Through its engaging storyline and well-developed characters, the film effectively sheds light on the issue of wealth inequality. Drawing upon the conflict theory perspective, this essay will analyze different aspects of the movie that highlight the existence and consequences of wealth inequality.
Body:
I. Systemic Discrimination:
The conflict theorist would argue that the movie portrays systemic discrimination as a significant factor contributing to wealth inequality. For instance:The character of Louis Winthorpe III, a privileged white man, is initially depicted as having an affluent life due to his family’s wealth and connections.
On the other hand, Billy Ray Valentine, an African American man, is shown to be living in poverty and struggling to make ends meet.
These contrasting circumstances illustrate how societal structures perpetuate disparities in wealth distribution based on race.
II. Power Dynamics:
Conflict theorists would also point to power dynamics as an essential aspect of wealth inequality depicted in the movie:The Duke brothers, Randolph and Mortimer, represent the capitalist elite who manipulate the stock market for their own gain.
Their actions result in Winthorpe losing his job, home, and social status while simultaneously exploiting Valentine’s potential.
This power imbalance showcases how the wealthy control resources and opportunities, exacerbating wealth disparities.
III. Socioeconomic Mobility:
Another point conflict theorists would emphasize is the limited socioeconomic mobility presented in the film:Winthorpe’s descent into poverty highlights how quickly an individual’s circumstances can change due to external factors.
Meanwhile, Valentine’s rise to success is portrayed as an exception rather than the norm, suggesting that opportunities for upward mobility are scarce for those in poverty.
This reinforces the notion that wealth begets wealth while perpetuating systemic barriers for those attempting to escape poverty.
IV. Reinforcement of Class Divisions:
Conflict theorists would argue that “Trading Places” reinforces class divisions through its portrayal of social interactions and stereotypes:The stark differences in lifestyle between Winthorpe and Valentine are emphasized to underscore the inherent privileges associated with wealth.
The film also depicts characters from lower socioeconomic backgrounds facing social stigma and discrimination.
Such representations contribute to the perpetuation of stereotypes and further solidify societal divisions based on economic status.
Conclusion:
“Trading Places” provides a compelling narrative that aligns with the conflict theory perspective on wealth inequality. By examining systemic discrimination, power dynamics, limited socioeconomic mobility, and the reinforcement of class divisions, conflict theorists would find ample evidence within the movie to support their arguments. This thought-provoking film serves as a reminder of the pervasive inequalities present in our society and encourages discussions around wealth distribution and social justice.
