The best strategies to make people aware of the basics of healthcare.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Title: Building Resilience: The United States’ Preparedness for Future Pandemics Post-COVID-19
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a global wake-up call, highlighting the importance of preparedness in dealing with infectious diseases. As the world grapples with the current crisis, it is essential to assess how the United States has evolved in terms of pandemic preparedness. This essay will discuss why the United States is better equipped to handle future pandemics that may arise after the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on improvements in healthcare infrastructure, surveillance systems, scientific advancements, and policy responses.
Body
1. Enhanced Healthcare Infrastructure
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed vulnerabilities in healthcare infrastructure worldwide, including the United States. However, it has also prompted a reevaluation of healthcare systems and investment in strengthening infrastructure. The experience gained from managing the current crisis has led to improvements in hospital capacity, the availability of critical medical supplies, and the establishment of field hospitals to handle surges in patient numbers. Additionally, there has been a renewed focus on bolstering healthcare workforce capacity through recruitment, training, and retention strategies. These developments ensure that the United States is better prepared to handle future pandemics with robust healthcare infrastructure in place.
2. Strengthened Surveillance Systems
Effective surveillance systems are crucial for early detection and containment of infectious diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of comprehensive and integrated surveillance systems. In response, the United States has made significant advancements in disease surveillance, including expanding testing capabilities, improving data collection and analysis, and enhancing coordination between federal, state, and local health agencies. These improvements enable rapid identification of outbreaks, timely implementation of public health measures, and a more proactive approach to managing future pandemics.
3. Scientific Advancements and Research Collaboration
The COVID-19 pandemic has witnessed an unprecedented level of scientific collaboration and research investment. Scientists worldwide have worked tirelessly to understand the virus, develop diagnostic tests, and accelerate the development of vaccines and therapeutics. The United States has played a leading role in these efforts, with significant investments in research institutions and collaborations between academia, industry, and government agencies. The knowledge gained from studying COVID-19 will undoubtedly enhance the United States’ ability to respond to future pandemics by leveraging scientific advancements and accelerating research processes.
4. Improved Policy Responses
The lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted the importance of proactive and evidence-based policy responses. The United States has witnessed a renewed commitment to public health preparedness at the policy level. This includes strengthening coordination between federal and state agencies, developing pandemic response plans, investing in public health infrastructure, and enhancing communication strategies to provide accurate information to the public. The establishment of dedicated task forces and agencies focused on pandemic preparedness further demonstrates a proactive approach to future outbreaks.
Conclusion
While the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed vulnerabilities in global healthcare systems, including that of the United States, it has also led to significant improvements in pandemic preparedness. Through enhanced healthcare infrastructure, strengthened surveillance systems, scientific advancements, and improved policy responses, the United States is better equipped to handle future pandemics that may arise post-COVID-19. However, it is crucial to sustain these efforts by prioritizing investments in public health infrastructure, maintaining robust surveillance systems, fostering scientific collaboration, and ensuring effective policy implementation. By doing so, the United States can build resilience and protect its population from future infectious disease threats.
