Write an argumentative essay about argue is sex before marriage is good
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Argumentative Essay: The Case for Sex Before Marriage
In contemporary society, the topic of sex before marriage remains a contentious issue, often shrouded in moral, religious, and cultural beliefs. While traditional norms may advocate for abstinence until marriage, there are compelling arguments to support the idea that engaging in consensual sex before marriage can have positive implications for individuals and relationships. This essay will explore the benefits of sex before marriage, debunk common misconceptions, and advocate for a more nuanced understanding of intimacy and human relationships.
Exploration of Individual Autonomy
One of the fundamental arguments in favor of sex before marriage is rooted in the principle of individual autonomy. Each person has the right to make decisions about their own body and sexual agency. By engaging in consensual sexual activity, individuals exercise their autonomy and assert control over their own choices. This empowerment can lead to increased self-confidence, self-awareness, and a deeper understanding of one’s desires and boundaries.
Emotional Connection and Compatibility
Sexual intimacy plays a crucial role in establishing emotional connections and fostering compatibility between partners. For many individuals, sexual compatibility is an important aspect of a romantic relationship. By exploring intimacy before marriage, couples can better understand each other’s needs, desires, and communication styles. This can contribute to building a strong foundation of trust, openness, and mutual respect within the relationship.
Health and Well-being
Engaging in safe and consensual sex before marriage also has implications for health and well-being. Open discussions about sexual health, contraception, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are essential components of responsible sexual behavior. By being informed and proactive about their sexual health, individuals can reduce the risk of unintended pregnancies and STIs. Additionally, regular sexual activity has been linked to various physical and mental health benefits, including stress reduction, improved mood, and enhanced cardiovascular health.
Challenging Stigma and Shame
The stigma surrounding sex before marriage often perpetuates feelings of shame, guilt, and judgment among individuals who choose to engage in premarital sex. Challenging these societal norms and promoting sex-positive attitudes can create a more inclusive and accepting environment for individuals of diverse backgrounds and beliefs. By normalizing conversations about sex and relationships, we can foster a culture of respect, understanding, and acceptance.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the argument for sex before marriage is grounded in principles of individual autonomy, emotional connection, health and well-being, and challenging societal stigma. By advocating for a more open and inclusive approach to discussions about sex and relationships, we can empower individuals to make informed choices that align with their values and beliefs. Ultimately, promoting a healthy attitude towards sexuality and intimacy can lead to stronger, more fulfilling relationships based on trust, communication, and mutual respect.