1: Hill Inc. security hired Smith to serve as a security guard who assaulted a resident of the apartment complex. Hill Inc. had no warning that Smith would attack anyone. Is Hill Inc. liable and what doctrine would apply?
Question 2: Hill Inc. is considering Clarence Smith to be a security guard. He was just released from prison for DWI conviction and is on probation and not allowed to drink alcohol. the job does not require drinking. Should Clarence Smith be given a second chance if you were in charge of Hill Inc?
Sample Solution
