Write a research paper on a comparison of Canadian and American health systems and how that corolates to the right to health in general (how that relates to International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights, the principle aspects of the right to health, international law, WHO & its history, countries responsibilities, etc.).
Plan:
Intro on the the International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights + briefly on the right to health
Section on the right to health
Section on the health system in Canada
Section on the health system in the USA
Section comparing both
Conclusion
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Research Paper: A Comparative Analysis of Canadian and American Health Systems in the Context of the Right to Health
Abstract:
This research paper aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of the health systems in Canada and the United States within the framework of the right to health as outlined in the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. By examining key aspects such as access, affordability, quality of care, and equity, this study seeks to analyze how each country’s healthcare system aligns with international standards and obligations related to the right to health.
Introduction:
The International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) enshrines the right to health as a fundamental human right, emphasizing the importance of ensuring access to healthcare services for all individuals without discrimination. This paper will explore the principle aspects of the right to health as defined by international law and examine how these principles are reflected in the healthcare systems of Canada and the United States. By comparing and contrasting these two systems, we aim to identify key differences, challenges, and implications for the realization of the right to health in both countries.
Section 1: The Right to Health
– Overview of the right to health as articulated in the ICESCR.
– Discussion of key principles such as availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality of healthcare services.
– Analysis of international legal frameworks and obligations related to the right to health.
Section 2: The Health System in Canada
– Overview of Canada’s healthcare system, including its structure, funding mechanisms, and delivery models.
– Examination of universal healthcare coverage under Canada’s publicly funded system.
– Evaluation of access to healthcare services, health outcomes, and disparities within the Canadian healthcare system.
Section 3: The Health System in the United States
– Overview of the U.S. healthcare system, including its mixed public-private structure and insurance-based model.
– Analysis of healthcare access and coverage challenges in the U.S., including disparities based on socio-economic factors.
– Discussion of the role of private insurance companies, healthcare costs, and quality of care in the U.S. healthcare system.
Section 4: A Comparative Analysis
– Comparative analysis of key indicators such as healthcare spending, life expectancy, infant mortality rates, and access to essential services between Canada and the U.S.
– Examination of strengths and weaknesses in each country’s healthcare system concerning the right to health principles.
– Identification of policy implications and recommendations for improving healthcare delivery and outcomes in both countries.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, this research paper has shed light on the contrasting healthcare systems in Canada and the United States within the context of the right to health. By analyzing key aspects such as access, affordability, quality of care, and equity, we have highlighted the differences and similarities between these two systems. Moving forward, it is essential for policymakers in both countries to prioritize the principles of the right to health outlined in international law to ensure that all individuals have equitable access to high-quality healthcare services. Only by addressing systemic challenges and promoting inclusive healthcare policies can Canada and the U.S. work towards fulfilling their obligations under the ICESCR and advancing the right to health for all.
