A Comparison of "A Rose For Emily" by William Faulkner and "Everyday Use" by Alice Walker

  A Comparison of "A Rose For Emily" by William Faulkner and "Everyday Use" by Alice Walker In literature, authors often use different techniques and themes to convey their messages to the readers. Two renowned American authors, William Faulkner and Alice Walker, have skillfully crafted their stories, "A Rose For Emily" and "Everyday Use," respectively. While both stories explore the complexities of human relationships and the effects of societal norms, they employ diverse narrative styles and perspectives. Through a comparative analysis, this essay will explore the similarities and differences between these two captivating works of fiction. Firstly, both Faulkner and Walker delve into the theme of the past's influence on the present. In "A Rose For Emily," Faulkner presents Emily Grierson, a woman trapped in the past, unable to let go of her family's aristocratic heritage. The decaying mansion she inhabits symbolizes her refusal to accept change. Similarly, in "Everyday Use," Walker focuses on Mama, the narrator, who values her family's history and heritage. Mama's connection to her ancestors is evident through her descriptions of the quilts, which are passed down through generations. Both stories emphasize the significance of understanding one's roots and how they shape one's identity. Secondly, Faulkner and Walker explore the effects of societal norms on their characters. In "A Rose For Emily," the story is set in a post-Civil War era southern town, where social class plays a pivotal role. Emily's isolation and her desperate attempt to maintain her status highlight the consequences of being an outsider in a strict society. On the other hand, in "Everyday Use," Walker addresses the issue of racial identity in a contemporary context. The character of Dee represents a new generation that seeks to embrace African heritage as a form of rebellion against societal expectations. Through these contrasting narratives, both authors shed light on the complexities of conformity and rebellion. Despite these similarities, Faulkner and Walker differ greatly in their narrative styles and perspectives. Faulkner's story is told from an omniscient point of view, creating a sense of detachment from the characters. This technique allows readers to observe Emily's life from a distance, forming their own interpretations of her actions. In contrast, Walker uses a first-person narrative in "Everyday Use," enabling readers to experience Mama's thoughts and emotions firsthand. This intimate perspective allows for a deeper connection with the characters and a richer understanding of their motivations. In conclusion, "A Rose For Emily" by William Faulkner and "Everyday Use" by Alice Walker both explore the themes of the past's influence on the present and the effects of societal norms on individuals. While both stories address these themes, they do so with different narrative styles and perspectives. Faulkner's detached omniscient point of view offers an objective observation of his character's lives, while Walker's first-person narrative creates a more personal connection between readers and her characters. Both authors skillfully capture the complexities of human relationships and provide valuable insights into the human condition through their masterful storytelling.

Sample Answer