Online research is a key skill for Walden coursework. Success depends upon your ability to find good resources in order to respond to discussion posts, finish assignments, write papers, and ultimately complete a study for your capstone. This guide will introduce you to the basics of online searching in the Walden Library, including:
choosing the best databases for your research topic
performing successful searches that retrieve relevant results
evaluating those results and using articles that will meet your needs
Choosing a good database
The Walden Library collections are held in databases. These databases are collections of books, journals, magazines, newspapers, reports, and more. Using the database search page, you enter search terms—and the database will retrieve all the items that match those terms.
The Walden Library has over 100 different databases to use, including:
multidisciplinary databases, which contain journals and periodicals in a variety of subject areas
subject specific databases, which contain journals covering research in that subject area (such as medical journals, psychology journals, management journals, etc.).
So with all of these collections available to you, where do you start? First, identify what you need to find. Are you looking for a scholarly (or peer-reviewed) research articles, or statistics, or a measurement instrument for a study?
Masters reported a total of $600 million in losses with over $3 billion of capital spending (Woolworths Ltd., 2016). It was restructured after Don Stallings, the managing director, was replaced by Matt Tyson. The roll-out was slowed down and investment was cut-back until the model was proven (McConnell, 2016). However, the fallout seemed inevitable and Masters stopped operation on December 11th 2016. Enumerate Options Woolworths needed a more effective risk management team, which would have foreseen the risks involved with entering a market or at least diverted the motive of bringing Masters into existence from attacking Westfarmers to actually looking for an entry into a profitable industry. The main fact that the Woolworths board failed to recognize is that Westfarmers allowed Bunnings to perform as a silo (Stewart, 2016). Recommendation 7.4 should have been followed in order to predict and manage material exposure to economic, environment and social risks (Hamilton & Mickelthwait, 2006). In addition to that, the composition of Woolworths’ board lacks expertise in new business development, research and specifically home improvement industry as shown in the skills matrix presented in the corporate governance statement. Recommendation 2.6 deals with induction and professional training to be provided to the directors. It should have been applied to equip directors with better knowledge about new business development. Principle 1 of the document states that “ a listed entity should establish and disclose the respective roles and responsibilities of its board and management and how their performance is monitored and evaluated” (ASX, 2014). Woolworths does specify the general roles of board and management. However, clear articulation of division of responsibility is lacking. Following Recommendation 1.1 would have given the board of directors a chance to create a path for the management to work upon. Assess and Make Preliminary Decisions>GET ANSWER