Name the Five “Civilized” Tribes and the Iroquois Confederacy. For the Iroquois Confederacy please include the date of the last group to join.
2. Why was the Potlatch made illegal to practice? Please include the dates of when this ruling was overturned in the U.S. and Canada.
3. Identify the major characters/images/totemic symbols visible in Pacific Northwest Crest Pole art.
4. Describe how and why Wampum was used by tribes in the Northeast.
5. List the techniques, and colors, involved in the Formline artistic style. Be sure to include all the information discussed/noted within readings and lecture notes.
6. List three (3) ceremonial practices noted and discussed within the East. (Hint: There are a number to select from stated within the various readings – Berlo, Lecture Notes, Course Reader articles.)
7. Who named the Formline technique in the Pacific Northwest?
8. What is the meaning of “Trade-in-Metaphors”?
9. List the seven (7) types of Crest Poles in the Pacific Northwest.
10. Who were the non-Native groups that colonized the East and what techniques of separation were installed in this region?
Section 3 – Essay Portion: References Required for all questions. *Essays are to be at least one (1) full page of text single-spaced or two (2) full pages of text double-spaced. Images used to support your essay are not included in the required page length for the exam.
Please select from one (1) of the following:
1. Discuss the art of George Morrison. Why is his work important? What may be some points of meaning within his art to prescribe contemporary Native People? There is a Case Study – with useful links – to his work within the Lecture Notes. Please be sure to include all references. Please Do Not conduct a general web search on his work, artistic history, and the like. This will be viewed as unacceptable as a means to complete this essay.
2. Discuss the performance art works of James Luna. Why is his work important? What does he mean when he states that there is a difference between “being a spectacle and making a spectacle?” What may be some points of meaning within his art to prescribe contemporary Native People? It may be useful to review the Lecture Notes – and embedded links – regarding this work for further assistance. Please be sure to include all references.
3. Review the video “Native Noise” (http://www.rebelmusic.com/#!music/rebel-music/feature/native-noise (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.). Discuss not only the important points, but also the artistic representations and use by these different musical artists. It will be useful to review the trailer and the other supporting content on the website (see Lecture Notes and included link to this site). Please be sure to include all references.
What are the suggestions for a firm that does not lead CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is regularly mixed up for a 21st century trendy expression when in reality it has been a piece of the business vocabulary for a considerable length of time. While some contend that the idea goes back to the Industrial Revolution, the main substantive work was composed by Peter Drucker in his 1954 book The Practice of Management. In spite of the progression of time, there is still no widespread meaning of CSR. Corporate Social Responsibility, what it is and how it is executed, is diverse relying on the nation a business works inside, the administrative framework they are liable to and even the business inside which they work. These entanglements aside, it is important to settle on balanced meaning of CSR keeping in mind the end goal to basically talk about the idea in this paper. The definition offered by the International Organization for Standardization will be utilized, as it is general in nature and pertinent to most organizations, in any case their nation of activity: "Social obligation is the duty of an association for the effects of its choices and exercises on society and nature, through straightforward and moral conduct that: adds to manageable advancement, including the wellbeing and the welfare of society considers the desires of partners is in consistence with pertinent law and predictable with universal standards of conduct; and Is coordinated all through the association and rehearsed in its connections." (International Organization for Standardization, 2010) They one shortcoming in this definition is the recommendation that CSR is about consistence with relevant law. In Dahlsrud's (2008) examination of 37 CSR definitions, he distinguished five basic measurements. The principal measurement is the earth and its thought in business tasks and the second is the social measurement which covers organizations considering their effect on society. Both of these measurements are fundamental to our working definition. The third measurement distinguished is the monetary measurement which searches for a promise to incorporating CSR into business tasks is additionally present similar to the fourth measurement which identified with how organizations ought to deal with all partner bunches in a socially dependable way (Dahlsrud, 2008). The last measurement, intentionality, is what is absent from the ISO definition. Dahlsrud (2008) characterizes intentionality as organizations settling on choices and undertaking exercises that are above what is lawfully required while the ISO definition (International Organization for Standardization, 2010) states that minor consistence is satisfactory. It is contended that just conforming to the law is better portrayed as great corporate administration and not of itself a demonstration of corporate social duty (Ashley and Crowther, 2012; Bênabou and Tirole, 2010). Integral to the CSR banter about is the thought of how society characterizes the part of business, and the subsequent duties. The exemplary parts and duties relegated to business are to outfit capital and different assets underway, to give work and important occupations, to lead research, advancement and development, to give products and enterprises to deal, to make riches for investors, representatives, clients and society on the loose. (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011) These center, development and benefit inspired obligations do address a few measurements of CSR, yet contrasting these with the duties supplied by CSR demonstrates the measure of progress important to move towards a socially capable plan of action. One extraordinary of the CSR face off regarding, regularly alluded to as the neo-established or conventional clash approach (Redman, 2005), contends that the main social obligation of business is to build benefits (Friedman, 1970). The opposite end of the range is the thing that Redman expressions the "genuine devotees" (2005, 78) way to deal with CSR. This is the place a firm has ecological and social duties set up that are not benefit propelled. In any case, genuine corporate unselfishness is uncommon with prove proposing that associations will probably receive an 'illuminated self-intrigue' way to deal with CSR (Porter and Kramer, 2006). This is an approach that binds socially mindful exercises to benefit making exercises (Redman, 2005). Illuminated self-intrigue has been one of the main impetuses behind corporate duty in connection to nature and use of panic assets. Contributions to creation, from crude items to petroleum derivatives, are getting to be alarm and organizations have expected to adjust to these progressions or hazard eradication (Ashley and Crowther, 2012). So while ecological effects are currently of more noteworthy worry to business, it could be contended this is more the survival of the business than a purposely socially dependable undertaking (Ashley and Crowther, 2012). In the meantime, society now holds more prominent desires of the business group (Scherer and Palazzo, 2011). With more elevated amounts of training (generally) and accordingly learning, there is to a lesser extent an inclination to trust the talk of business. Ashley and Crowther contend that clients are not searching for flawlessness of business rehearses, but rather "the do expect trustworthiness and straightforwardness" (2012, pg.3). The ascent and ascent of online networking has likewise made a quick and universal means for individuals to censure organizations for (saw) socially unreliable acts (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011). The media likewise can give center and broad scope around organizations who have occupied with questionable practices (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011). Organizations who utilize third world (regularly slave) work are being named and disgraced, and compelled to reassess their production network rehearses (Ashley and Crowther, 2012). In spite of these advances, the most recent decade has seen illustrations where self-direction and mindful corporate conduct have bombed stupendously (Lynch-Wood et al, 2009), causing such occasions as the Global Financial Crisis. Scarcely any, parts of society stay unaffected by these occasions. The reaction by approach creators and administrators has been quick and corrective. The net outcome being more prominent consistence and revealing necessities crosswise over most associations and enterprises. Presently there exists little qualification between what might have been viewed as a CSR association and one that practices great corporate administration (Money and Scheper, 2007; Mason and Simmonds, 2014). It is insincere to deny that the CSR development has not positively affected the business group. In any case, the staggering measure of advance in socially mindful activity has been started by the consumption of normal assets and the requirement for organizations to enhance tasks, changes in the public arena and societal desires of business and government authoritative reaction to corporate failings. Being socially mindful is currently simply great business, a basic segment of operational and vital basic leadership (Porter and Kramer, 2006). Whichever way it is has been accomplished, there are results that still exist for association that don't direct CSR. Both the recognition and reality of organization execution can be upgraded by receiving CSR. A few intellectuals contend the result is long haul, others contend that there is no result by any means (McWilliams et al, 2006). Above productivity, there are various dangers associations confront on the off chance that they don't take part in CSR conduct. It ought to be noticed that the accompanying isn't a comprehensive rundown, just the ones with the best potential effect. Reputational harm has dependably been a key result of socially untrustworthy business exercises (Walker and Dyck, 2014). Notoriety can be characterized as the total view of an associations inner and outside partners (Walker and Dyck, 2014) and speaks to an association's single most prominent immaterial resource. When notoriety is lost, or if nothing else affected altogether, it is hard to get back. Changes to the speed with which notoriety harming data can spread is additionally of worry to socially reckless associations as it is considerably more hard to stow away or deny wrong doing (Ashley and Crowther, 2012).Further to this, Walker and Dyck's (2014) examine demonstrated a positive connection between's an association's notoriety and those with corporate social obligation. Representative engagement and drawing in ability seems to run as an inseparable unit with socially capable corporate practices (Bhattacharya et al., 2008). The worldwide economy has been portrayed as a 'learning economy' (Fitzgerald and Cormack, 2011), with the best corporate resources living in the scholarly undertaking of staff. Bhattacharya et al. (2008) additionally contend that CSR is a route for a firm to demonstrate their qualities by and by and along these lines candidly captivating representatives to accomplish the greater part of the association's objectives. >GET ANSWER