2 Ted Talks Compare and Contrast Rhetorical Analysis
These two ted talks are what the essay are supposed to be about. I have also provided a document that has what the essay should contain.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Title: A Rhetorical Analysis of Two TED Talks on College Athletics: Exploring Exploitation and Citizenship
Introduction:
Briefly introduce the two TED Talks: “The Exploitation of US College Athletes” by Tim Nevius and “What College Sports Teaches Us About Citizenship” by Kendall Spencer.
Provide an overview of the purpose of the essay: to compare and contrast the rhetorical strategies used in these talks and analyze their effectiveness.
Thesis statement: Through their use of personal anecdotes, appeals to emotion, and evidence-based arguments, both Tim Nevius and Kendall Spencer effectively engage their audience while presenting contrasting perspectives on the issue of college athletics.
Body:
1. Personal Anecdotes:
Discuss Tim Nevius’ use of personal anecdotes in “The Exploitation of US College Athletes.”Analyze how he shares his experience as a former NCAA investigator to establish credibility and connect with the audience emotionally.
Assess how these anecdotes contribute to his argument about the exploitation faced by college athletes.
Examine Kendall Spencer’s use of personal anecdotes in “What College Sports Teaches Us About Citizenship.”Evaluate how he shares his personal journey as a student-athlete to establish credibility and foster an emotional connection with the audience.
Analyze how these anecdotes support his argument about the positive impact of college sports on personal development and citizenship.
2. Appeals to Emotion:
Analyze the emotional appeal used by Tim Nevius in “The Exploitation of US College Athletes.”Evaluate the use of vivid language, storytelling techniques, and tone to evoke empathy and outrage from the audience.
Discuss how this emotional appeal strengthens his argument about the need for change in college athletics.
Assess the emotional appeal employed by Kendall Spencer in “What College Sports Teaches Us About Citizenship.”Analyze the use of personal narratives, inspirational language, and a positive tone to engage the audience emotionally.
Discuss how this emotional appeal supports his argument about the transformative power of college athletics.
3. Evidence-Based Arguments:
Examine the evidence-based arguments presented by Tim Nevius in “The Exploitation of US College Athletes.”Analyze his use of statistics, legal cases, and documented examples to support his claims about the unfair treatment of college athletes.
Evaluate the effectiveness of these arguments in persuading the audience to consider his viewpoint.
Evaluate the evidence-based arguments put forth by Kendall Spencer in “What College Sports Teaches Us About Citizenship.”Analyze his use of research, personal experiences, and historical examples to support his claims about the benefits of college sports.
Discuss how these arguments contribute to his overall message about the value of college athletics.
Conclusion:
Summarize the main points discussed in the essay, highlighting the rhetorical strategies used by both Tim Nevius and Kendall Spencer.
Reiterate that while they present contrasting viewpoints on college athletics, both speakers effectively engage their audience through personal anecdotes, appeals to emotion, and evidence-based arguments.
Reflect on the impact of these talks in raising awareness about the exploitation faced by college athletes and the positive aspects of college sports.
Encourage further critical thinking and discussion about these issues in order to drive positive change in the realm of college athletics.
