Describe a situation of ethical dilemma that you have experienced in practice and how it was resolved. (Saunders, 2014)

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Scenario:

Imagine a software development team working on a new mobile app for a healthcare provider. The app is designed to track patient vital signs and medication adherence. During the final testing phase, a junior developer discovers a significant bug that could potentially lead to inaccurate readings in certain situations. Fixing the bug would require significant time and resources, potentially delaying the app’s launch, which is already behind schedule. The project manager, under pressure to meet deadlines, suggests downplaying the bug’s significance and releasing the app with a plan to address it in a future update.

Ethical Dilemma:

This situation presents an ethical dilemma with conflicting values:

  • Patient Safety: The potential for inaccurate readings could compromise patient safety and lead to adverse health outcomes.
  • Professional Responsibility: Software developers have a responsibility to ensure the quality and safety of their products.

Scenario:

Imagine a software development team working on a new mobile app for a healthcare provider. The app is designed to track patient vital signs and medication adherence. During the final testing phase, a junior developer discovers a significant bug that could potentially lead to inaccurate readings in certain situations. Fixing the bug would require significant time and resources, potentially delaying the app’s launch, which is already behind schedule. The project manager, under pressure to meet deadlines, suggests downplaying the bug’s significance and releasing the app with a plan to address it in a future update.

Ethical Dilemma:

This situation presents an ethical dilemma with conflicting values:

  • Patient Safety: The potential for inaccurate readings could compromise patient safety and lead to adverse health outcomes.
  • Professional Responsibility: Software developers have a responsibility to ensure the quality and safety of their products.
  • Project Deadlines and Business Interests: Delaying the launch could have financial implications for the company and impact the team’s performance evaluations.
  • Transparency and Honesty: There is a question of whether to be transparent with the healthcare provider about the known bug.

Resolution:

The team decides to follow a structured ethical decision-making process:

  1. Gather Information: They thoroughly document the bug, its potential impact, and the time and resources required for a fix.
  2. Identify Stakeholders: They consider all affected parties, including patients, the healthcare provider, the development team, and the company.
  3. Evaluate Alternatives: They explore various options:
    • Delay the launch to fix the bug.
    • Release the app with a warning about the bug and a plan for a quick fix.
    • Downplay the bug’s significance and release the app as planned.
  4. Apply Ethical Principles: They consider relevant ethical principles, such as:
    • Beneficence: Acting in the best interests of patients.
    • Non-maleficence: Avoiding harm to patients.
    • Autonomy: Respecting the right of the healthcare provider to make informed decisions.
    • Justice: Ensuring fairness and equity in the distribution of benefits and risks.
  5. Make a Decision: After careful deliberation, the team decides to be transparent with the healthcare provider about the bug and its potential impact. They recommend delaying the launch until the bug is fixed, emphasizing the importance of patient safety.
  6. Justify the Decision: They explain their reasoning, highlighting the ethical principles and the potential consequences of releasing the app with the known bug.
  7. Act on the Decision: They communicate their findings and recommendations to the project manager and the healthcare provider.

Outcome:

The healthcare provider appreciates the team’s honesty and commitment to patient safety. They agree to delay the launch until the bug is fixed. The company, while initially concerned about the delay, ultimately supports the decision, recognizing the importance of ethical conduct and protecting their reputation. The development team is commended for their ethical decision-making and their dedication to producing a high-quality product.

Lessons Learned:

This scenario highlights the importance of:

  • Ethical awareness: Recognizing and understanding ethical dilemmas.
  • Ethical decision-making frameworks: Using structured processes to analyze and resolve ethical issues.
  • Ethical leadership: Creating a culture where ethical considerations are valued and prioritized.
  • Transparency and communication: Being open and honest with stakeholders.
  • Prioritizing patient safety and well-being: In healthcare-related fields, this is paramount.

While this is a hypothetical example, it illustrates the types of ethical dilemmas that can arise in professional practice and the importance of having a framework for ethical decision-making. Real-world situations can be more complex and may involve additional factors, but the core principles of ethical conduct remain the same.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer