Many of my students acknowledged and condemned the ways schools perpetuate various forms of oppression, but asserted that, as teachers, their jobs will be to teach academics, not disrupt oppression (Kumashiro, 2002, pp. 1-2 cited in Ferfolja et al., 2018, Understanding Sociological Theory for Educational Practices, p. 1). What does this statement mean and why is it problematic? Drawing on one of the topics listed above, how might this perspective contribute to inequities in the access and outcomes of marginalised students? Include in your explanation appropriate theoretical concepts that help us to understand these inequities. What do teachers and schools need to do to promote greater equity in this area?

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Addressing Oppression in Education: The Role of Teachers in Promoting Equity

Introduction

The statement that teachers’ primary role is to teach academics, not disrupt oppression, reflects a common perspective among educators who may feel unequipped or hesitant to address social issues and systemic inequalities in their classrooms. This sentiment, while understandable, is problematic as it perpetuates inequities in education and fails to recognize the critical role teachers play in promoting equity and social justice. Drawing on sociological theory for educational practices, we can explore how this perspective contributes to inequities in access and outcomes for marginalized students and what steps teachers and schools can take to promote greater equity.

Thesis Statement

The reluctance of teachers to address oppression in education can contribute to inequities in access and outcomes for marginalized students, highlighting the need for educators to actively engage in promoting social justice within their classrooms.

Understanding the Reluctance to Disrupt Oppression

The assertion that teachers should focus solely on academics and not disrupt oppression stems from various factors, including:

– Perceived Role Boundaries: Some educators may view addressing social issues as outside the scope of their responsibilities.
– Fear of Controversy: Teachers may be apprehensive about engaging in discussions around oppression due to concerns about conflict or pushback.
– Lack of Training: Limited exposure to social justice pedagogy and diversity training may leave teachers feeling ill-equipped to address complex societal issues in the classroom.

Impact on Marginalized Students

When teachers adopt a stance of neutrality or avoidance towards addressing oppression, it can have detrimental effects on marginalized students, such as:

– Silencing Marginalized Voices: Failing to acknowledge and challenge oppressive systems can silence the experiences and perspectives of marginalized students.
– Reinforcing Inequities: By avoiding discussions on oppression, teachers may inadvertently perpetuate existing power imbalances and inequalities within the educational system.
– Limiting Empowerment: Without opportunities to critically engage with social justice issues, marginalized students may lack the tools and agency to advocate for themselves and challenge systemic injustices.

Theoretical Concepts

Drawing on critical pedagogy principles, we understand the importance of educators critically examining power dynamics and inequities within educational settings. Critical pedagogy encourages teachers to engage students in dialogue around social justice issues, empowering them to become agents of change in challenging oppressive structures.

Promoting Equity in Education

To promote greater equity in education and address the reluctance to disrupt oppression, teachers and schools can:

1. Integrate Social Justice Education: Incorporate diverse perspectives, anti-oppressive content, and critical discussions into the curriculum to foster a more inclusive learning environment.
2. Provide Professional Development: Offer training and resources for educators to develop their understanding of social justice pedagogy and strategies for addressing oppression in the classroom.
3. Create Safe Spaces: Establish a supportive and inclusive classroom culture where students feel empowered to speak up about social injustices and engage in meaningful dialogue.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the reluctance of teachers to disrupt oppression can perpetuate inequities in education and marginalize students from diverse backgrounds. By embracing their role as agents of change and actively promoting social justice within their classrooms, educators can create more equitable learning environments that empower all students to thrive. Through ongoing commitment to challenging oppressive structures and fostering inclusivity, teachers and schools can work towards a more just and equitable educational system for all.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer