Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Advantages and Disadvantages of Collaborating with Physician Organizations for FPA Legislation
Introduction
When pursuing Full Practice Authority (FPA) legislation for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs), collaboration with physician organizations can have both advantages and disadvantages. This essay explores the benefits and drawbacks of collaborating with physician organizations in the pursuit of FPA legislation.
Advantages of Collaboration
Increased Credibility: Collaborating with physician organizations lends credibility to the APRN profession’s push for FPA legislation. The support of physicians can help counteract any opposition or skepticism from policymakers and the public, as physicians are seen as key stakeholders in the healthcare system.
Leveraging Expertise: Physician organizations possess valuable medical knowledge and experience that can enhance the APRN profession’s understanding and implementation of FPA legislation. Collaboration allows for the exchange of ideas, best practices, and guidance on how to navigate potential challenges in practice regulations.
Unified Political Front: By collaborating with physician organizations, APRNs can present a unified front to legislators, demonstrating that healthcare professionals are in agreement regarding the importance of granting full practice authority to APRNs. This can be influential in garnering legislative support and advancing the FPA cause.
Disadvantages of Collaboration
Differing Interests: Physician organizations may have different priorities and interests compared to APRNs. Physicians may be concerned about perceived encroachment on their scope of practice or competition for patients, leading to potential disagreements on the specifics of FPA legislation. These differences can hinder collaboration and slow down progress.
Power Dynamics: Collaborating with physician organizations may result in power imbalances, with physicians holding more influence and decision-making power due to their established position in healthcare hierarchies. This power dynamic could lead to compromises that favor physician interests over those of APRNs, potentially diluting the impact of FPA legislation.
Slow Progress: Collaboration can sometimes slow down the progress of FPA legislation as consensus-building and negotiations take time. APRNs may find it challenging to align their goals and timelines with physician organizations, potentially delaying the achievement of FPA legislation.
Conclusion
Collaborating with physician organizations when pursuing FPA legislation for APRNs has both advantages and disadvantages. While collaboration can increase credibility, leverage expertise, and present a unified front, it also runs the risk of differing interests, power dynamics, and potential delays in progress. APRNs must carefully consider these factors when deciding whether to collaborate with physician organizations and ensure that any collaboration remains focused on advancing the goal of achieving FPA legislation that benefits both professions and improves patient care.
