Alexander the Great or Terrible?

  Alexander the Great or Terrible? In the article “Alexander the Great: Or the Terrible?” written by Brooke Allen, the author explores the complex character and reputation of Alexander the Great. Allen delves into various aspects of Alexander’s life and achievements, challenging the traditional view of him as a universally admired conqueror. Main points about Alexander Military Genius: Allen acknowledges that Alexander was undoubtedly a military genius who led his armies to numerous victories, conquering vast territories and establishing one of the largest empires in history. She recognizes his strategic brilliance and ability to inspire his soldiers. Cultural Integration: The author highlights Alexander’s efforts to integrate different cultures into his empire. She emphasizes that he encouraged intermarriage between his Greek soldiers and foreign women, promoted the adoption of Persian customs, and even adopted certain aspects of the conquered cultures himself. Allen argues that this cultural integration was an attempt to bind his empire together and ensure its stability. Tyrannical Rule: Allen also highlights the darker side of Alexander’s reign. She points out that he was often ruthless and brutal in his conquests, ordering the slaughter of thousands and destroying entire cities. She argues that his actions were driven by a desire for power and control rather than any sense of justice or benevolence. Alexander’s reputation Allen challenges the commonly held view that Alexander was universally admired and revered throughout history. She argues that his reputation has been shaped and manipulated by various individuals and societies over time. For instance, she claims that ancient historians like Arrian and Plutarch wrote biased accounts that portrayed Alexander as a heroic figure, omitting or downplaying his flaws. The author also suggests that Western societies have idealized Alexander due to their fascination with great conquerors. She argues that this idealization has led to a distortion of his true character and actions. Allen asserts that it is important to critically examine historical figures like Alexander, acknowledging both their achievements and their shortcomings. Recent works on Alexander Regarding recent works on Alexander the Great, Allen expresses a sense of relief that these works are more willing to provide a balanced and nuanced view of the conqueror. She praises authors such as Paul Cartledge and Robin Lane Fox for their more critical approach, acknowledging both Alexander’s greatness and his darker aspects. Allen also highlights the importance of revisiting historical narratives and reevaluating our understanding of figures like Alexander. She suggests that by examining multiple perspectives and incorporating new sources of information, we can gain a more accurate understanding of historical events and personalities. In conclusion, Brooke Allen’s article challenges the traditional narrative surrounding Alexander the Great, presenting a more complex and nuanced portrayal of the conqueror. She acknowledges his military genius and cultural integration efforts while also highlighting his tyrannical rule and the manipulation of his reputation throughout history. Allen stresses the importance of critically examining historical figures and incorporating diverse perspectives to gain a more accurate understanding of their legacies.  

Sample Answer