Who were the abolitionists and how did the abolitionist movement impact the debates over slavery before the Civil War?
I. Key Information
For this assignment, you will write a short paper (500-600 words) that answers the question: Who were the abolitionists and how did the abolitionist movement impact the debates over slavery before the Civil War?
NO outside research is needed for this assignment.
NO works cited page is needed for this assignment.
This assignment requires that you analyze the abolitionist movements from its inception in the 1830s to its most active and efficacious phase in the 1850s using the following sources:
1. Give Me Liberty!, Chap. 12 & Chap. 13. NOTE: Consult chapter 12 for information about the abolitionist movement and chapter 13 for the various issues related to the debate over slavery.
2. Lecture PowerPoint on abolitionism and John Brown.
II. Main Requirements
The purpose of this assignment is to answer the prompt question by doing the following:
1. Illustrate a clear understanding of the abolitionist movement as a whole.
2. Develop a clear argument (i.e. thesis statement) that makes a concrete connection between the abolitionist movement and its influence on the politics of slavery.
3. Incorporate relevant evidence by way of at least three direct quotations from Give Me Liberty!—one in the introduction, one in paragraph two, and one in paragraph three.
4. Describe the abolitionist movement and at least one key aspect of the movement, and then link that element of the movement to one major point of controversy regarding slavery during the 1840s and 1850s.
NOTE: You can also use the PowerPoint on the abolitionism and John Brown for background information, but you must also incorporate evidence from the textbook and documentary.
III. Structure of Paper
Your analytical paper should be FOUR paragraphs long.
Paragraph one is your introduction; it should be 150-200 words long and provide general information about the abolitionist movement and the problem of slavery before the Civil War. Towards that end, it should:
1. Briefly summarize key details about abolitionism and address some—but not all—of the ways it helped make slavery a matter of debate during the 1840s and 1850s.
2. Contain a clear thesis statement that directly answers the central question of the prompt.
3. Incorporate one direct quotation from Give Me Liberty! that provides context and/or illustrates the historical significance of abolitionism.
Paragraph two should be 100-150 words long and briefly describe the historical development of the abolitionist movement. This paragraph should:
1. Clearly describe the origins of abolitionism in the 1830 and explain how the movement evolved in the 1840s and 1850s;
2. Clearly identify two key issues the movement championed to end slavery in the US;
3. Incorporate one direct quotation from Give Me Liberty!
Paragraph three should be 100-150 and analyze—make concrete connections—the links between abolitionism and the various controversies over slavery during the 1840s and 1850s by doing each of the following:
1. Discuss the general tenor of the debates over slavery during the 1840s and 1850s;
2. Identify one key slavery-related controversy from that era;
3. Analyze how abolitionism played a role in the debate over that issue;
4. Incorporate one direct quotation from Give Me Liberty!
The fourth paragraph is your conclusion and should be 50-100 words long. This paragraph should briefly restate your thesis and the evidence you offered in support of your thesis.
An A paper will not only be organized along the lines laid out above, but also include direct quotations with parenthetical citations in paragraphs one, two, and three.
NOTE: All quotations should include MLA-style parenthetical citations—the author’s last name and the page number from which the quotation is taken inside parentheses—at the end of the sentence where the quotation is given. Again, a works cited page is NOT needed for this assignment.
Hence, in conditions of contention about the 'what', methodology arranging needs to join forms that prompt accord about the 'what' on the off chance that it is to amplify support and consistence from partners. Slide 7: (Test your comprehension) Slide 8: Accepting, for the present, that there is agreement about the 'what' of a vital arrangement, the subsequent stage is to decide the moves that are to make place to accomplish that 'what' – the 'how'. Now and then accomplishing the target includes activities that, in spite of the fact that they might be perplexing, are known. Assembling a motorcar is a perplexing arrangement of steps that are, notwithstanding, surely understood – to such an extent that the procedure can be designed in a relatively programmed sequential construction system. Building a clinic is more mind boggling and altered, yet the means and their grouping are notable. Settling on another auto configuration to fabricate, or deciding how to choose where another healing facility ought to be manufactured, is more dangerous. Slide 9: The end result for the procedure of key arranging if the errands required to accomplish a 'what' have large amounts of vulnerability? At the point when this happens, the procedure of key arranging must consolidate learning. Assignments should be executed as investigations to check whether they work. Slide 10: Various scholars have depicted different arranging techniques that join accord building, when there is vulnerability about 'what', and realizing, when there is vulnerability about how. Obviously, if there are the two vulnerabilities about 'what' and 'how', the arranging procedure should both form accord about the 'what' and take in the 'how'. (Snap each case to take in more and access the following slide.) Slide 11: Tragically, much vital arranging, since it is high request arranging, happens with regards to high vulnerability about both 'what' and 'how'. You will soon be adapting more about the outcomes of this. Initially, what is a successful arranging process in this specific situation? Second, by what other means may the arranging procedure be influenced? In view of the trouble (inconceivability) of arranging normally in this unique circumstance, vital arranging goes up against different purposes. Slide 12: (Take after the directions to test your comprehension and access the following slide.) MPH5304 Leading and overseeing in general wellbeing and social insurance Slide 13: As we have just investigated, traditional formal arranging is dangerous in settings of high vulnerability about 'what' to plan and 'how' to accomplish the arrangement. Indeed, endeavors to build up clear targets, as the initial step of the levelheaded arranging process, regularly have the impact of crashing the entire procedure as partners scramble to accomplish their goal, best case scenario, or to guard against another partner accomplishing their goal. In any dubious circumstance, with numerous hypothetical results, partners under danger have a tendency to fantasize that the conceivable result will be the most exceedingly awful they can envision. It is this most exceedingly bad result that partners will safeguard against. For instance, if two associations are combining, the most exceedingly awful result for a staff part is that they will be saved. Of course, the main response to such a declaration is mechanical activity about employer stability. Slide 14: So what works in these conditions? Pava, among others, has watched fruitful usage of techniques in various conditions. The procedure has been depicted as nonsynoptic frameworks change. Great formal arranging is portrayed as brief in that a legitimate movement from targets, to design, to execute, to assess, empowers a complete mental view, or summary. Non-concise suggests a new, unusual, and even confused process that must be lived to be comprehended. This arranging typology would propose that established formal vital arranging would just suitably happen in settings of low vulnerability about 'what' and 'how'. Be that as it may, one watches endeavors at vital arranging in the full scope of settings. For what reason may this be so? Associations appear to take part in formal getting ready for an assortment reasons, either to seem, by all accounts, to be objective, or as an instrument of authoritative control. Pause for a minute to tap on each progression in the non-brief frameworks change to take in more. Slide 14, Step One: Topics are uncertain, ambiguous proclamations of authoritative heading, regularly indicating subjective change. Their unclearness welcomes doubt, yet they are so great ('Mum and crusty fruit-filled treat') that who could oppose this idea? Pioneers verbalize them; this gives them authenticity. Be that as it may, they are regularly remotely propelled, suggesting a principal change in values, a subjective irregularity, something extremely new. A few cases of topics are • • 'enhancing the nature of patient care'; • • 'an incorporated administration framework'; and • • 'a more grounded Victoria'. Thusly, subjects are the direct opposite of the unmistakable, unambiguous, quantifiable target of formal arranging. The reason topics have these attributes is that their unclearness empowers a scope of partners to assemble to act for the sake of the subject. (They should be obscure yet sufficiently significant to connect with at any rate the principle partners). The key is to induce activity for the sake of MPH5304 Leading and overseeing in general wellbeing and medicinal services the topic. Pioneers may need to request that partners suspend mistrust in the topic until the point when they have acted. >GET ANSWER